Ive never thought, "wow i wish i could check out these pics of naked chicks while i talk to my mom."
I would be careful the next time you start a thread or the cronies might completely rip you apart.Why can I talk and surf simultaneously when I'm using my Wi-Fi connection, but not when I'm on the 3G network? Thanks!
Wow do you live under a rock? You NEVER saw AT&T 50 million stupid commercials about this? Because verizon is still running on the cdma network, not the faster, but much more unreliable gsm network. And seriously does this problem come up that often? Ive never thought, "wow i wish i could check out these pics of naked chicks while i talk to my mom."
First of all: to the posters who "ripped" the OP - it is a valid question. I have had to take phone calls while tethered, and guess what? My tether is severed because Verizon doesn't have talk & surf.
This is not a dumb question, nor should it have been met with contempt or ridicule. I wish Verizon had the capability as well, but I would rather have the big Red with its reliability than an AT&T network phone.
Remember, everybody has different needs and different ways of using their phones (business, personal, etc.)
We are a community. No need to be arrogant. Remember, at one time you too were a noob.
Cheers,
B.D.
That's what I said, except you sounds smarter saying it.The simplest technical answer is that CDMA networks send data in an unbroken "stream" once a connection is established. A GSM nework (like AT&T's) breaks up data into tiny "packets" that are reassembled on the other end.
This means that a CDMA stream cannot be interrupted. But in a GSM environment more than one one activity (e.g. voice and data) can share a single circuit with packets coming from each source.
There are advantages to each technology. CDMA advocates maintain it provides better performance and reliability (i.e. fewer dropped connections). GSM advocates point to the ability to share a circuit for multiple purposes.
That's what I said, except you sounds smarter saying it.The simplest technical answer is that CDMA networks send data in an unbroken "stream" once a connection is established. A GSM nework (like AT&T's) breaks up data into tiny "packets" that are reassembled on the other end.
This means that a CDMA stream cannot be interrupted. But in a GSM environment more than one one activity (e.g. voice and data) can share a single circuit with packets coming from each source.
There are advantages to each technology. CDMA advocates maintain it provides better performance and reliability (i.e. fewer dropped connections). GSM advocates point to the ability to share a circuit for multiple purposes.
That's what I said, except you sounds smarter saying it.The simplest technical answer is that CDMA networks send data in an unbroken "stream" once a connection is established. A GSM nework (like AT&T's) breaks up data into tiny "packets" that are reassembled on the other end.
This means that a CDMA stream cannot be interrupted. But in a GSM environment more than one one activity (e.g. voice and data) can share a single circuit with packets coming from each source.
There are advantages to each technology. CDMA advocates maintain it provides better performance and reliability (i.e. fewer dropped connections). GSM advocates point to the ability to share a circuit for multiple purposes.
Perhaps just more verbose. I've noticed, though, that this discussion often suggests that people believe VZW or Motorola can simply "enhance" the network or phone to provide the dual functionality. The sad fact is that all design involves compromises (much like marriages) and Verizon decided a long time ago that the advantages of a CDMA network outweighed its disadvantages.
That's what I said, except you sounds smarter saying it.
Perhaps just more verbose. I've noticed, though, that this discussion often suggests that people believe VZW or Motorola can simply "enhance" the network or phone to provide the dual functionality. The sad fact is that all design involves compromises (much like marriages) and Verizon decided a long time ago that the advantages of a CDMA network outweighed its disadvantages.
I've read several places, this thread included about the LTE network, I am going to look it up for more information... But I was curious if we could get a response from YOU(jsh1120) what LTE is and what the differences will be if this thing gets off the ground.
It's nice to have info in one spot, I suppose