as long as root tether and apps similar are on the market, I find it hard to believe that verizon feels it's quite that problematicI doubt this is going to make moto jump because it is not just their decision it is vzw as well. The more we keep bricking phones an using large amounts of data through unauthorized tethering, the harder they are going to push.
as long as root tether and apps similar are on the market, I find it hard to believe that verizon feels it's quite that problematicI doubt this is going to make moto jump because it is not just their decision it is vzw as well. The more we keep bricking phones an using large amounts of data through unauthorized tethering, the harder they are going to push.
as long as root tether and apps similar are on the market, I find it hard to believe that verizon feels it's quite that problematicI doubt this is going to make moto jump because it is not just their decision it is vzw as well. The more we keep bricking phones an using large amounts of data through unauthorized tethering, the harder they are going to push.
VZW doesn't control what's available in the market. Although they could go the AT&T route of locking down sideloading.
As for tethering, someone made a great point that you can tether without root via PDAnet
I doubt this is going to make moto jump because it is not just their decision it is vzw as well. The more we keep bricking phones an using large amounts of data through unauthorized tethering, the harder they are going to push.
I really don't understand why Moto pushes Blur down our throats when no one seems to like it at all.
I know my vote is in there. Will they listen, no. But when people start going to HTC to even more pad their bottom line, they may start to realize they went in the wrong direction.
I really don't understand why Moto pushes Blur down our throats when no one seems to like it at all.
The general user could care less about blur......It's a very small amount of users that don't like it.