sweeeeet
Silver Member
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2010
- Messages
- 8,579
- Reaction score
- 65
s3 has like 2100 or 2200 unless u meant bionic
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
I believe a lot has to do with the chip manufacture. From what I understand, the newer chips like the ones in the GSIII and Note II is manufactured using the newer 28 nm process while the older chips like in the Bionic and the Rezound were manufactured using the older process (30-something nm?). Supposedly the new chips have a much lower power consumption. The SIII has a 1650 mAH standard battery and my son can last the entire day on that, and while he doesn't use it when he is in school, when he is out he regularly streams Pandora.
Same here! I went through the S3, MAXX HD, DNA, and now the Note 2. The Note 2 is the best phone I've used, it took me a little while to adjust to the size but I love the thing now, I don't even find myself using my Nexus 7 anymore.I've purchased several phones at full retail over the years. With most of those, after a few days of use, I kind of regret not having waited a little bit so that I could save a couple hundred bucks by buying one slightly used or new from someone who was just looking to make some money off selling their upgrade device. But that hasn't been the case in the slightest with the Note 2. It was worth every penny. I've never been this completely satisfied with a phone.
I've purchased several phones at full retail over the years. With most of those, after a few days of use, I kind of regret not having waited a little bit so that I could save a couple hundred bucks by buying one slightly used or new from someone who was just looking to make some money off selling their upgrade device. But that hasn't been the case in the slightest with the Note 2. It was worth every penny. I've never been this completely satisfied with a phone.
The standard battery in the S3 is 2100mAh. The S2 had a 1650mAH standard battery.
You're definitely right about the architecture used in the newer chips. They are definitely much more efficient than the older ones.
What ticks me off is if you look at phone prices, the subsidized price always goes on sale, or goes lower over time, but the full retail price never changes.
That's purely business. All carriers would rather sell a device on contract and get you on the hook for another two years versus just selling the phone outright. So, they're naturally going to place the incentives to buy with the subsidized price.
I can understand the carriers, but what about the other retailers like Best Buy or Amazon? Are they purchasing the phone from Verizon, or from Samsung?
found a local one for 600.. what's retail 649?699?
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
seen a razr HD for 150.. isn't it sad I wouldn't take it, even for free lol
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk
trust me it crossed my mind 15 times already to go get it for 150 and ebay it for 450 lol