SquireSCA
Silver Member
On a pro-Android site, you're likely to get a lot of reasons... here are mine.
Apple uses their own proprietary version of Torx screws on their products to prevent consumers from getting into their devices. This means you can't replace the battery on your own; nor can you replace the micro SD cards to increase your capacity (partly so Apple can create the illusion of a tiered pricing structure). You can buy these custom screwdrivers online, but you can bet Apple isn't happy about it.
Apple is one of the most litigious tech companies; in all fairness, they have done a great deal to spearhead existing tech to better fit consumer needs (especially on the tablet front), though I wouldn't go so far as to say all their patents are "innovative". Both Google and Apple (heck, ALL large companies) have ignored patents to further their business, though both Fandroids and Mactards refuse to admit it.
Unlike Microsoft, Apple isn't suing Android manufacturers to get licensing money... they're suing to prevent other companies from selling competing devices. More than words, this anti-competitive behavior shows how bitter and afraid they are of Android's growth, despite their bragging about how iOS is a superior platform.
Particularly disgusting, considering how Apple used to be the underdog, and has now become the litigious behemoth they used to stand against.
One more reason: Google has been coaxing its partners into unlocking their phones for custom firmware development, and many have agreed. By contrast, Apple threatens to sue jailbreakers to the fullest extent of the law.
I think Apple's staff is 50% engineers, 50% lawyers.
One of the things that I hate about Apple is that for all of their whining about how Microsoft would bully the competition out of the market or sue them into oblivion, Apple has taken up doing the exact same thing.
I also don't like how they tell their customers what they want in features, not let the market tell them. An example is MMS texts. For two years, every smartphone or even cheap flip-phone could snap a pic and send it to a friend's phone via text.
Not Apple. The "most powerful smartphone on the planet" could not do that simple task, because Apple felt that "email was the superior method". Even though their customers clamoured for it and it was pretty much an industry standard for 2 years. Sending via email is fine if the other person is sitting at their PC or has a smartphone with email, but so many people didn't. So if I took a quick pic of something on my bike and wanted send the pic to my mechanic's phone to ask him if I had it installed right, I couldn't do that.
Lots of little things like that, where they intentionally hold back basic features that people want and other companies offer, all so that they can sell you an app or release it next year as an upgrade, thus allowing you to do the things that the stupid phone should have done out of the box from day 1.
I also don't like the smug attitude of Apple fans and their TV commercials... The "if you don't have an iPhone, well, you don't have an iPhone"... It actually irritates me and has me saying to the TV screen, "No, I don't have an iPhone, so I can complete my calls. I don't need a magnifying glass to watch a movie on a postage stame sized screen. I can do what I want with my phone, change the battery, add more memory, have features added without having to ask Steve Jobs for permission."
So no, I no longer have an iPhone, because I upgraded to something better. LOL