Activist Puts Wireless Carriers On Notice to Provide Regular Android Security Updates

Discussion in 'Android News' started by dgstorm, Feb 5, 2013.

  1. dgstorm

    dgstorm Editor in Chief Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    10,248
    Likes Received:
    3,536
    Trophy Points:
    823
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +3,765
    [​IMG]

    For some people, the adage, "If it's to be, it's up to me," is a way of life as well as a great philosophy. You can probably lump activist, Chris Soghoian, into that category. Many of us here across the Android community complain about how frustrating it is that the wireless carriers take too long to provide regular updates to the Android OS. Mr. Soghoian, who also happens to be the principal technologies and senior policy analyst with the American Civil Liberties Union, has chosen to actually do something about it. There's a new post over on Slashdot detailing his new campaign in which he "puts the wireless carriers on notice." Here's a quote with some additional detail,

    It's great to see that someone with some clout is finally putting pressure on the carriers to get their act together. We will obviously be keeping an eye on this to see if any headway is made. Sound off with your point of view.

    Thanks to our tipster!

    Source: Slashdot
     
  2. johnomaz

    johnomaz Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,966
    Likes Received:
    511
    Trophy Points:
    178
    Location:
    Central Valley, California
    Ratings:
    +606
    Current Phone Model:
    LG G4
    Then root your phone and ROM it. I'm sorry, though it sucks how long carriers take...it is completely up to them to even provide updates. It drives me insane but lets face it, the vast majority of users don't care or even know about updates. They don't know what ICS or JB means let alone what KLP means.
     
  3. Asgard

    Asgard Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2012
    Messages:
    118
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +22
    While I agree a little with you, since I've been on JB since two days after it was announced. The carriers are the problem when it comes to the dreaded "fragmentation" of android.
    And I put it on quotes because it has been proven that a Galaxy S running GB has the same features that the iPhone 5. But the general public relies on carriers for the updates.
     
  4. dgstorm

    dgstorm Editor in Chief Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    10,248
    Likes Received:
    3,536
    Trophy Points:
    823
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +3,765
    Speaking of the carriers being the problem, it seems unrealistic for the general consumer to be expected to put a new ROM on their device. While all of us in the forums know how easy and fun it can be, the average customer, should be supported better than they are from the carriers with at least regular security updates.
     
  5. Crankintopwater69

    Crankintopwater69 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,909
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Greensboro,NC
    Ratings:
    +116
    Well said sir,that's why Ive just promoted you too Editor in Chief.You can thank me later.:biggrin:
     
  6. androidlearner

    androidlearner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2011
    Messages:
    140
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Peoria, AZ
    Ratings:
    +10
    While I do hate how horrible Verizon is about pushing updates out it's not always their fault... Sometimes the manufacturers put out devices they never intend to update or put out so many there's no possible way to update them all.
     
  7. jerkwad

    jerkwad Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2011
    Messages:
    271
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +20
    that's not the answer and you are giving an "out" for the carriers which is crazy in my opinion...

    1. ROMing voids warranties, why would that be a realistic approach to security for people like our parents?! they have no clue how to do that, nor do they want to incur the abnormalities that come along with that...so no, ROMs are not the answer
    2. It may be "up to the carries" but take a step back and apply that logic to Microsoft or Apple or Oracle or anybody else that is BIG in their respective business. If they don't patch a security vuln people don't say "meh, it's their choice, it's cool". They have an obligation to PAYING customers to ensure their software/hardware is stable and secure. Carries make NO money on providing updates, that's why they don't do it. All of the other big names do it because they DO make money off of it. It's called support contracts. It's purely about money, nothing else. If they could sell update subscriptions to phone subscribers they would do it in a heart beat!
    3. Most users may not understand or know about "updates" as you put it, but ask them if they care about their devices having feature X or feature Y or, more importantly, ask them if they care about their phones being secure/safe from common exploits/attacks/etc. You better believe that anyone with 1/3 of a brain would say "YES".

    I am glad someone with some clout is saying what this community has been saying for years. I may not be a huge apple supporter, but I do admire the work that apple puts into the OS and the long line of updates that they provide their users over the years. As another user mentioned, the fragmentation is a huge issue. But if the carriers are (eventually) forced to provide updates, say, within 6 months of a known vuln, they will quickly realize that they can't sell 187 different (and mostly JUNK) android phones OR maybe they will provide a more open development platform and have the hardware vendors handle the updates OR maybe they will migrate to a model where they support the phone but don't support the software (ie no bloat and carrier agnostic devices become more the norm and leave the software updates to the vendors/google! *gasp*)
     
  8. jerkwad

    jerkwad Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2011
    Messages:
    271
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +20
    it's the carriers choice to sell or not sell a phone on their network. if they are held responsible, they will start reducing the number of phones and/or start requiring the vendors to provide timely updates in their contracts. it is really that simple. fragmentation is purely to blame on the carriers. i can't fault a vendor for making 1000 different phones in the hopes of selling them in different markets around the world to maximize profits. until they are required (by law or by contract) to provide updates, that won't change. as soon as you make verizon/att/sprint responsible for the products that they _choose_ to sell, things will change. they won't take the cash-flow hit, they will pass it on to the vendor in the form of contract agreements for updates, etc. the only thing I fear is inflated prices due to something like this. but i bet we would all be willing to pay 20-50 more for a phone that actually stays current, longer...that's the beef with most of us. we pay hundreds of dollars for a phone that gets left in the dust after 3 months with no support.
     
  9. mountainbikermark

    mountainbikermark DF Super Moderator Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    5,774
    Likes Received:
    2,274
    Trophy Points:
    478
    Ratings:
    +2,572
    No matter who says what, cash is king. As long as cash keeps flowing in from sales of devices and the data network things will not change.
    IPhone has no bloatware yet isn't a top seller on any carrier anymore (there was a recent article on this forum with specifics),even when head to head by model. Because Apple is starting to lose some of its mountain of cash (still a huge mountain though) we may see something different from them next year but overall the average consumer seems to be ok with skinned Android and until sales models show any different that won't change.

    Support Our Troops!!!
    <><
    A Rezound phone was used for this Tapatalk post
     
  10. BHubartt26

    BHubartt26 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2012
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +0

    I'm not sure that we don't already pay for support. Admittedly, crappy support....but support.

    If you have a problem with your service/bill you can go into a store and talk to a rep or call someone and get it sorted out. Don't remember the last time I paid for that...if ever.

    If you have a issue with your phone, and it's under warranty, you can go into the store and have someone do a factory restore. Their troubleshooting skills are poor(granted)....but technically it is support....and they did not charge you for it because you are a subscriber.

    It may not be detailed in the bill as "support", but somewhere in there we are paying for the call center/store reps.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Feb 6, 2013
  11. jntdroid

    jntdroid DF Super Moderator Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2009
    Messages:
    6,445
    Likes Received:
    297
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    TX
    Ratings:
    +297
    If Apple has done one thing right, it's keeping control of their product away from the carriers. Obviously, having a much more exclusive product lineup is a major plus in keeping that control, but it's still kind of refreshing to see them do it... :blink:

    And while we all say we'd love to see Google do this, we know that'll never happen. Rubin said a couple of years ago that Google is open source for the carriers / OEMs, not so much for the consumer. Most consumers couldn't care less about that aspect of Android.
     
  12. Crankintopwater69

    Crankintopwater69 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2011
    Messages:
    1,909
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    143
    Location:
    Greensboro,NC
    Ratings:
    +116
    So,with the facts you just stated,do you think all this(Activist puts Wireless Carriers on notice)is for nothing?