luv2increase
Member
I want everyone to know that in real world testing between these 2, I would say that they perform equally well when Apex is set to 1ghz and Rubix is at 600mhz. This is when using ADW as the default launcher.
When both are set to 1ghz, there is not even a hint of a comparison. Remember, I'm not talking about synthetics here.
If you are on apex, I challenge you to create a Nandroid backup and install Rubix to see for yourself. The proof is in the pudding
10/26/10
EDIT: I FORGOT TO MENTION!
I've ran the folllowing code a few days after my Rubix installation. I guess I may be basing my feelings off a tweaked Rubix vs Apex.
If you have Rubix, run the following code and then put on your dirty shades
$ su
# mount -o rw,remount -t ext3 /dev/block/mmcblk1p21 /system
# chmod 755 /system/etc/init.d/01cpuod
# chmod 755 /system/etc/init.d/02vm
# busybox run-parts /system/etc/init.d
You only need to run it once. Drod mentioned this at XDA but may not have here. It will increase performance and battery life!
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk
When both are set to 1ghz, there is not even a hint of a comparison. Remember, I'm not talking about synthetics here.
If you are on apex, I challenge you to create a Nandroid backup and install Rubix to see for yourself. The proof is in the pudding
10/26/10
EDIT: I FORGOT TO MENTION!
I've ran the folllowing code a few days after my Rubix installation. I guess I may be basing my feelings off a tweaked Rubix vs Apex.
If you have Rubix, run the following code and then put on your dirty shades
$ su
# mount -o rw,remount -t ext3 /dev/block/mmcblk1p21 /system
# chmod 755 /system/etc/init.d/01cpuod
# chmod 755 /system/etc/init.d/02vm
# busybox run-parts /system/etc/init.d
You only need to run it once. Drod mentioned this at XDA but may not have here. It will increase performance and battery life!
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk