Has anyone else received FRG22 OTA?

glenn

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2009
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Standing by for what ever happens with the FRG22. I grabbed the FRG01B manual update on Wednesday and zero complaints. LOVE IT
 
OP
J

JFDroid

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
226
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
I'm not at all familiar with Android naming conventions, but is FRG22 a name that Android came up with, or did Pete invent it?

If the name FRG22 is purely a product of P3, then somebody has really gotten creative with your roomy's phone.

Just as ESE81 was the official name for the 2.1 Android update everyone received, FRG22 is the "official" name for one version of 2.2 for the Motorola Droid. It's the build number. Check this photo of my partner's Droid: at the bottom, it shows FRG22 as the build number. The phone is not rooted.

Twitpic - Share photos on Twitter
 
OP
J

JFDroid

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2009
Messages
226
Reaction score
0
Location
Ohio
Pete told me to have my partner use ASTRO to e-mail me the update.zip file and then Pete will verify if it's FRG22. When he goes to lunch and calls me, I'll have my partner e-mail me the file. Maybe this can be sorted out in a couple of hours from now.
 

lmapp

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2009
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Location
MS
I'm not at all familiar with Android naming conventions, but is FRG22 a name that Android came up with, or did Pete invent it?

If the name FRG22 is purely a product of P3, then somebody has really gotten creative with your roomy's phone.

Just as ESE81 was the official name for the 2.1 Android update everyone received, FRG22 is the "official" name for one version of 2.2 for the Motorola Droid. It's the build number. Check this photo of my partner's Droid: at the bottom, it shows FRG22 as the build number. The phone is not rooted.

Twitpic - Share photos on Twitter

I thought FRG01b was the official name for Droid's 2.2 .
 

Sal

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
344
Reaction score
0
Location
D.C.
I'm not at all familiar with Android naming conventions, but is FRG22 a name that Android came up with, or did Pete invent it?

If the name FRG22 is purely a product of P3, then somebody has really gotten creative with your roomy's phone.

Just as ESE81 was the official name for the 2.1 Android update everyone received, FRG22 is the "official" name for one version of 2.2 for the Motorola Droid. It's the build number. Check this photo of my partner's Droid: at the bottom, it shows FRG22 as the build number. The phone is not rooted.

Twitpic - Share photos on Twitter

I thought FRG01b was the official name for Droid's 2.2 .

It is. Frg22 is the next update.of froyo/2.2. My question is: how many people have actually gotten frg01b over the air from verizon? I can't find reports of any and that was rolling out for a day or two before the suspension rumors.
 

deputc26

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
720
Reaction score
1
Too bad it's not rooted or you could make a nandroid backup of it.
 

MotoCache1

Chief Droid Scientist
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
530
Reaction score
1
As would many other folks, I'd be very interested to have that update.zip if it is indeed a legit untouched, signed-voles-FRG22-from-FRG01B-xxxxxxxx.zip. Of course if we knew what the xxxxxxxx was (probably a the signature fingerprint hash) then we could just download it directly. Unfortunately an 8 digit hex number has 4,294,967,295 possible combinations so we're not going to be guessing the number anytime soon.
 

briboy

New Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2010
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
As would many other folks, I'd be very interested to have that update.zip if it is indeed a legit untouched, signed-voles-FRG22-from-FRG01B-xxxxxxxx.zip. Of course if we knew what the xxxxxxxx was (probably a the signature fingerprint hash) then we could just download it directly. Unfortunately an 8 digit hex number has 4,294,967,295 possible combinations so we're not going to be guessing the number anytime soon.

If I had the file I believe I could provide those 8-digits.
 

MotoCache1

Chief Droid Scientist
Joined
Jun 30, 2010
Messages
530
Reaction score
1
There are two OTA files (ESE81 and FRG01B) available to test any theories you have about generating the number. I tried jarsigner and it tells who signed them and that the signature is valid, but no 64 bit hash of any kind.
 
Top