its underclocked to 768mhz
How can you go through a thread of DI owners, then look at reviews on the net, and then look at rebuttals, and then still say that?
cause i have the phone lol.
not under clocked. definitely running at the advertised 1ghz.
its underclocked to 768mhz
nope...it's true 1ghz.
I returned my moto after 30 days and went to the di. I did not want to start my 2 years with out the latest technology...
Furthermore, simply citing the specs (1ghz) doesn't resolve the issue, either. The fact that the chip is capable of a particular speed doesn't mean it's actually clocked at that speed in a particular device.
Furthermore, simply citing the specs (1ghz) doesn't resolve the issue, either. The fact that the chip is capable of a particular speed doesn't mean it's actually clocked at that speed in a particular device.
We will just have to agree to disagree. Hard to dispute the manufacturers info when there is no other reputable information (other than rumor and unverified info) to back up claims to the contrary.
It's already been discussed that the incredible and the n1 have the same processor, only difference is that one chip is for cdma and the other is for gsm.
Either way the gist of this is that the incredible is blazing fast in everyday usage.
I know how OLEDs and LCDs work. There was a test done on the N1 screen and it did not perform how they should in theory. I'm not disagreeing that normally, OLEDs are better than LCDs, but currently the OLED display in the N1 vs the LCD in the Droid is not better.
I would post the link but I have posted it several times and I'd rather not search my posts again to link it again so nobody will read it again lol.
From what I read the OLED screen in the N1 is poor excuse for an OLED screen and the Droid's LCD is very nice.
Even if it cost no more? What did you dislike about it? Any positives?Played with my friends incredible for a while the other night, and I have to say I would never trade my Droid for one