Verizon Lays Claim To Android’s Success

Discussion in 'Droid Forums Member News Depot' started by luv2golf, Dec 1, 2010.

  1. luv2golf
    Offline

    luv2golf New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    136
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    So Cal
    Credit Mobile Crunch


    Verizon Lays Claim To Android’s Success
    by Greg Kumparak on December 1, 2010

    [​IMG]
    Touching on the topic of why LTE will be successful during their press call this morning, Verizon tooted their own horn a bit by bringing up, curiously enough, the success of Android. To quote Verizon CTO Tony Melone:
    Android really took off when Verizon got involved.
    Strong words — and ones that have some Android devotees in quite the tizzy. But are they true?

    Absolutely.
    Verizon wasn’t the first to launch an Android handset. That was T-Mobile.
    They’re also not the one’s with the most Android handsets; that, again, is T-Mobile, with 14 unique Android handsets compared to Verizon’s 11.
    They were, however, the first to really put insane amounts of effort and money behind marketing an Android device — or more accurately, a line of Android devices. Right off the bat with their first Android device, the Moto Droid, Verizon started branding all of their high-end Android devices with the “Droid” moniker.
    Then they took that name and ran with it; commercial after abstract commercial, they dumped tons of resources and TV air time to their Droid line-up while firing off interest-destroying duds like this one for their other phones.
    Then came the print ads.
    Then, as anyone who has driven around a major city in the past few years could tell you, came the billboard ads.
    There’s a reason that just about every other person refers to any and all Android phones as “Droids” (much to every Android fanboy’s dismay) — Verizon’s dumped more effort into actively marketing Android than just about anyone else, and had more success in doing it. The only folks who even really come close are Motorola, with their full-page New York Times ads and Superbowl commercials; unfortunately, the former focused mostly on bashing the iPhone, while the latter mainly focused on making you think about .
    Homebrew/hacker communities are great for the geek crowds (and everyone else, in the long run), and every carrier filling their lineup with Android handsets certainly hasn’t hurt — but to convince those carriers to do so, and to really make those communities flourish, requires at least one party to have an overwhelming and resoundingly successful marketing campaign. That was Verizon.
  2. hookbill
    Offline

    hookbill Premium Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2009
    Messages:
    19,545
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    N.E. Ohio
    But of course Verizon is responsible. Great advertising prior to product launch brought the interest up tremendously.

    Still I don't think you can say any of the other Android phones at the time compared to the Droid. To me it just seems like other phones around then, such as the Eris were distant cousins to a Droid.
  3. jroc
    Offline

    jroc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    3,843
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Yea ppl always mention Apple and marketing.....Verizon did an amazing job of advertising the Droid line up. Even the Fascinate, not a Droid was marketed good IMO. Verizon is even jumping in with ads for the iPad.
  4. diverbelow
    Offline

    diverbelow New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2010
    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Vancouver WA
    That and VZW has lot of awesome high end smartphone to choice from last year. Granted TMO had the mid-range android phones and was the first. AT&T had none and Sprint none or low end.

    VZW marketing really got the word out and TMO is following the same route and finally they got some great high end phones.