Google's own wireless carrier

mountainbikermark

Super Moderator
Staff member
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
7,570
Reaction score
4,043
Eventually cell phone use will be completely free
Back before the turn of the century Popular Science did an article on digital cell phone service that predicted by around 2010 there would be unlimited minutes just like your home phone for about $50 a month. It didn't get into data usage or predict the reason for it being sms and data being the new cash cows as the reasoning, just that it would be so main stream that it'd naturally become the replacement for the home phone due to convenience. The thing I remember most about the article was they predicted AT&T would be the one to introduce it and the plethora of other carriers would fall in line. This was back before all the mega mergers when we had a boat load of carriers to choose from.
I can see where some would predict "free" service in the future but that supposedly free would be because there is 1 carrier run by the government. Some really do want a national carrier but with any government run entity comes government strings in reality. There is no free lunch.

Support Our Troops !!!
<><
Beast Mode 4
 

FoxKat

Premium Member
Premium Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2010
Messages
14,651
Reaction score
4,703
Location
Pennsylvania
Current Phone Model
Droid Turbo 2 & Galaxy S7
Eventually cell phone use will be completely free
I'd like to believe that, and just from the fact that they can gain advertising dollars by targeting us and monitoring our use it does have merit, however I highly doubt it. We are seeing more and more attention being paid to privacy with regard to how you use your phone, and yet we are also seeing more and more ways that both carriers and web content providers (read Google et Al), are utilizing cookies and other methods to track our usage and sell that information to marketing and advertising firms so it's not completely farfetched.

We have free broadcast TV but that is simply because it's (presently) one-way communication and THEY control the content. Forced advertisement is the revenue engine there. If they could come up with a forced advertisement revenue engine for cell phone communications where we would both have to listen to and/or watch advertisement, and even be forced to interact in order to assure that we're paying attention I don't see that model working.

There is one other possible model. Like supermarkets now have bonus rewards or points that can be used towards gasoline or in-store discounts, these retailers and others could issue credits (maybe Bitcoins?), as rewards for shopping at their establishments and those credits could be applied to your cellphone bill, or for that matter, in the case of a true currency based credit any bill. This I could see working.

We shall see. Remember, you saw it here first and that constitutes a patent.

Sent from my Droid Turbo on Tapatalk.
 
Last edited:

mountainbikermark

Super Moderator
Staff member
Premium Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
7,570
Reaction score
4,043
.

.



Remember, you saw it here first and that constitutes a patent.

Sent from my Droid Turbo on Tapatalk.

Apple probably already has one

Support Our Troops !!!
<><
Beast Mode 4
 

Jeffrey

Premium Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
6,645
Reaction score
3,511
Location
Thailand
Current Phone Model
iPhone 7 Plus JB
According to the WSJ, Google will announce Fibre expansion to Atlanta, Raleigh-Durham and Charlotte tomorrow.
 

cr6

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
8,281
Reaction score
5,802
Location
NW Rocky Mtn region
Website
www.dronewolfmedia.com
Current Phone Model
Galaxy S7 Edge
Twitter
@dronewolfmedia
Nobody is addressing the elephant in the room.
Are people willing to give up their average monthly price of $50 bucks a month in lieu of $120 service? It's hard to say....
 

Jeffrey

Premium Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
6,645
Reaction score
3,511
Location
Thailand
Current Phone Model
iPhone 7 Plus JB
Nobody is addressing the elephant in the room.
Are people willing to give up their average monthly price of $50 bucks a month in lieu of $120 service? It's hard to say....
$120 includes 150+ channels of TV. $70. for 1000Mbps up and down. I would pay the additional $20 bucks. Basic service is free.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cr6

cr6

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
8,281
Reaction score
5,802
Location
NW Rocky Mtn region
Website
www.dronewolfmedia.com
Current Phone Model
Galaxy S7 Edge
Twitter
@dronewolfmedia
Then you have the question of how many of those 150+ channels are worth watching? 5-10% maybe if you're lucky. I'd go with the 70 plan and stream my own content. Which is still 20 more than what we were paying before we cut the cord almost 2 years ago.
 

Jeffrey

Premium Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
6,645
Reaction score
3,511
Location
Thailand
Current Phone Model
iPhone 7 Plus JB
Then you have the question of how many of those 150+ channels are worth watching? 5-10% maybe if you're lucky. I'd go with the 70 plan and stream my own content. Which is still 20 more than what we were paying before we cut the cord almost 2 years ago.
I have 300+ channels and your right 75% are garbage IMO. But others may have interest in what I do not. Each to their own.
I don't have a choice. If I want all the HBO channels plus the limited US channels they offer I have to pay the price which is $100. a month.
If the Google deal was available here, I'm all over it.
 
Top