Google and Oracle Ordered to Disclose Which Journalists They Paid for Coverage

dgstorm

Editor in Chief
Staff member
Premium Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
10,992
Reaction score
3,961
Location
Austin, TX
oracle-paid-bloggers.png

Remember that patent wars case that wrapped up a couple of weeks ago between Oracle and Google? Apparently, it isn't completely finished. The judge in that case, William Alsup, has ordered both Google and Oracle to fess up on which bloggers and journalists they paid to influence the media.

In case you missed the drama here is the backdrop on why this is important. During the Oracle v. Google proceedings, several websites found out that Florian Mueller, of the blog FOSS Patents, had been paid by Oracle and Microsoft to write articles regarding the legal proceedings of their cases. What was particularly distressing about this, was that many of his articles seemed to slant in favor of Microsoft or Oracle. Additionally, his work was the source of many reports across the web, which indirectly made other journalists a party to his potential misconduct (we use the word potential because it was never proven that he intentionally skewed his writing, but it was suspect).

Here's a quote from The Verge article with the rest of the details,

It sounds like whatever is revealed from the court order won't have any immediate bearing: Judge Alsup says it's more important that this information makes it into the case now so that it can be considered for the appeal or a potential remand of the case in the future. Both companies have until noon, Pacific Time, on Friday the 17th to submit their disclosures.

Update: Google tells us that it will be complying with the order.

Update #2: An Oracle spokesperson has provided us with a comment as well — that points a finger squarely at Google:

"Oracle has always disclosed all of its financial relationships in this matter, and it is time for Google to do the same. We read this order to also include indirect payments to entities who, in turn, made comments on behalf of Google."

That's an interesting and humorous twist to the case, isn't it?

Source: TheVerge
 
OP
dgstorm

dgstorm

Editor in Chief
Staff member
Premium Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
10,992
Reaction score
3,961
Location
Austin, TX
We don't know that for sure yet, but it does look that way.
 

cellphonedork

Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
So much for neutral reporting. His bent always seemed to be against Google. The sad thing is that every other news agency thought that he knew best and as such used his quotes in their reports. I always kinda thought the guys was a tool and this confirms it.
 
Top