Oracle vs Google Trial; Jury Comes Back: Google Did NOT Infringe Any Patents

Discussion in 'Android News' started by dgstorm, May 23, 2012.

  1. dgstorm
    Offline

    dgstorm Editor in Chief Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    7,615
    Likes Received:
    1,593
    Trophy Points:
    258
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +1,608
    [​IMG]

    Google just scored a major victory in the Oracle vs. Google patent infringement trial. After a week of deliberations, the Jury has come back with a verdict that Google did NOT infringe upon any of Oracle's patents. Oracle was suing Google for eight alleged infringements of two different patents, but apparently, the Jury came back in favor of Google. This is a huge win for Google, although there were multiple parts to this trial that have yet to be fully ruled upon. Here's a quote from The Verge with some final details,

    Afterwards, both companies issued press statements:

    Source: TheVerge
  2. wicked
    Online

    wicked DF Administrator Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    472
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    San Jose, CA
    Ratings:
    +482
    This is huge! Oracle wanted billions from Google, now they're lucky if they get 500k in "damages" :crazy:
  3. MissionImprobable
    Offline

    MissionImprobable Silver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,916
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +84
    Hoorah!
  4. Caesars
    Offline

    Caesars Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Messages:
    1,218
    Likes Received:
    44
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +44
    I actually didn't follow this case, was it a legit argument or was it as stupid as apple trying to stifle Samsung?
  5. dgstorm
    Offline

    dgstorm Editor in Chief Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    7,615
    Likes Received:
    1,593
    Trophy Points:
    258
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +1,608
    ^^. It was actually even less valid. The primary dispute was over 8 lines of code, that could have been purely an accidental coincidence, and not an intentional theft. Additionally, those lines of code have yet to be ruled upon by the Judge as to whether they were even able to be copyrighted by Oracle to begin with.
  6. guidot
    Offline

    guidot Developer Relations Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2010
    Messages:
    7,352
    Likes Received:
    274
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    Ratings:
    +274
    AND to top it all off, the judge presiding was a "code jockey" himself, which made it even worse for Oracle. He said something to the effect of, how do you know it was stolen? This code wouldn't have taken long to write and test, so why would they bother stealing it?
  7. jroc
    Offline

    jroc Silver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    3,843
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    163
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Ratings:
    +61
    Just read about this at work in a news paper.

    So glad about this. I agree, the judge knowing a lil bit about codes, tech probably helped.