What's new
DroidForums.net | Android Forum & News

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Wireless Moot

Status
Not open for further replies.
sargentmajord said:
Then ur phone doesnt benefit from OCing u have to get set cpu an run the long bench
Good OC

<img src="http://www.droidforums.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=56692"/>

Bad OC

<img src="http://www.droidforums.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=56694"/>

Sent from my 1.600 ghz 3615 quadrant score ICS .247 DROID BIONIC

Just ran it on mine it took 155 ms. I'm OC'd to 1.3 ghz on 905. Sound like a decent score? Figured I'd ask since you appear to be the master of pushing this phone to the limit.

All I wanted was a Pepsi, just one Pepsi...
 
mjs27541 said:
Just ran it on mine it took 155 ms. I'm OC'd to 1.3 ghz on 905. Sound like a decent score? Figured I'd ask since you appear to be the master of pushing this phone to the limit.

All I wanted was a Pepsi, just one Pepsi...

Yes u will know if u oc to high the soft touch buttons will vibrate erratically an u will immediately get a long bench of 500+ms an yes 155 ms sounds perfect

Sent from my 1.600 ghz 3615 quadrant score ICS .247 DROID BIONIC
 
sargentmajord said:
Yes u will know if u oc to high the soft touch buttons will vibrate erratically an u will immediately get a long bench of 500+ms an yes 155 ms sounds perfect

Sent from my 1.600 ghz 3615 quadrant score ICS .247 DROID BIONIC

Awesome thanks. I was happy with 1.2 ghz until I saw you went to 1.6. 1.3 is stable for me so far, if it stays that way may bump it again.

All I wanted was a Pepsi, just one Pepsi...
 
sargentmajord said:
Yup here is a pic

<img src="http://www.droidforums.net/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=56696"/>

Sent from my 1.600 ghz 3615 quadrant score ICS .247 DROID BIONIC

That's sick. Have you played around with any of the other IO schedulers? I'm giving noop a whirl on mine.

All I wanted was a Pepsi, just one Pepsi...
 
Those complaining about battery life should seriously consider factory resetting and disabling bloatware.
I have disabled most of the bloatware you recommended, except Text Messaging and Voicemail, which I use. I have Smart Actions set to turn off WiFi, GPS, cellular data, and background sync when the screen is off. My battery is down to 20% in a little under 7 hours. With 246/247, I jumped from 1.0 GHz to 1.2 GHz max, and I now have virtually continuous 4G. These improvements are much appreciated, but could they have cut my battery life nearly in half? Is factory resetting the only solution? View attachment 56697
 
mjs27541 said:
That's sick. Have you played around with any of the other IO schedulers? I'm giving noop a whirl on mine.

All I wanted was a Pepsi, just one Pepsi...

Noop sucks sio is a balance of deadline an cqf an cqf is as good as deadline

Sent from my 1.600 ghz 3615 quadrant score ICS .247 DROID BIONIC
 
sargentmajord said:
Noop sucks sio is a balance of deadline an cqf an cqf is as good as deadline

Sent from my 1.600 ghz 3615 quadrant score ICS .247 DROID BIONIC

Thanks for the tip, going back to deadline.

All I wanted was a Pepsi, just one Pepsi...
 
For those wondering about my background...I started on a vic 20 when I was 7. My grandparents got a C64 to run their business so I got to use it when I was here (I bought their house a few years ago) on weekends. So I played on both of those Eventually got my own C64. Got into hacking copy protections (it was a hobby...wasn't pirating games, just wanted to learn how the encryption they used worked and how to defeat it). Moved up to an Amiga. And when I was in college I built my first 386-40 with WFW 3.11. I was one of the few who could multitask doom and still be online (bbs') at the same time. :P

Those 386-40s were nice. In most cases, they'd outperform a 486DX/33. At one point I had a system based on the Cyrix Cx486SLC/25 - I upgraded it to a 386DX/40. Yes, it was a significant UPGRADE.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top