The Low Down on Verizon’s LTE Network from their 4G Fact Sheet

Discussion in 'Droid Forums Member News Depot' started by JimMariner, Oct 21, 2010.

  1. JimMariner
    Offline

    JimMariner New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    2,545
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    SE Florida

    [​IMG]


    Verizon is gearing up for the launch of their 4G LTE network come November 15th, and while no handsets will be available initially that should quickly change come early 2011. For now the only way to take advantage of the high-speed network will be through MiFi and mobile broadband cards, but that doesn’t mean we aren’t all at least a bit curious about how Verizon is positioning their LTE technology in comparison to Sprint, their biggest 4G rival at the moment, and their WiMAX network.


    [​IMG]


    While we have heard arguments that could go either way in terms of which technology is actually superior, it remains a fact that a large portion of carriers are choosing to go with LTE, leaving Sprint and Clearwire as the only providers of WiMAX coverage. Verizon is boasting that LTE will allow for even greater speeds and reliability, as well as global adaptability, in contrast to WiMAX. As a Verizon subscriber, LTE is the main reason I will forego the numerous holiday launches and wait it out for a real 4G Android beast on Big Red, how about you all?


    by Kevin Krause
    on October 21st, 2010
    Source
  2. jstafford1
    Offline

    jstafford1 DF Super Moderator Rescue Squad

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,080
    Likes Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Hebron, Oh.
    I'm hoping the Moto superphone(Olympus,terminator,T2) will be the first to launch Android on 4g with Honeycomb!!!!!

    Sent from somewhere...
  3. chaz.ring
    Offline

    chaz.ring New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Michigan
    I'm installing both technologies at the moment..... I'm guessing that LTE is more popular because it is more cost efficient.... the WiMAX equipment and technology is far more expensive than that of the LTE tech.... I'm not saying that the WiMAX is better, or faster, as I have not had the chance to try them both out side by side. But the WiMAX equipment is by far more expensive.;)
  4. Quicksilver7714
    Offline

    Quicksilver7714 DF Super Moderator Rescue Squad Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    2,444
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Interesting. That's nice to know, that might affect my choice to change carriers. I'm currently 2 weeks in to testing/trying out Sprint's network. I have the Evo but not for the 4g as stated in my sig. But this info is nice because Sprint is a smaller company but they're implementing the more expensive technology. So this might affect how long I will have to wait for 4g in my area. If I keep Sprint. I want this phone 'http://www.droidforums.net/forum/droid-news/75362-gorgeous-mysterious-evo-ish-htc-device-headed-verizon.html?highlight=EVO-ISH+DEVICE'. That would make me happy I can do without 4g.
    I also want to put it out there that live in the metro Detroit area which does not have Sprint's 4g and will not be getting Verizon's LTE network either at launch. :(

    Trying out Sprint for a month. Sent from my Evo using Tapatalk. 4G is pointless when you don't live in one of the few available network areas.
  5. bhall238
    Offline

    bhall238 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2009
    Messages:
    343
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    For the U.S. I found this:
    Verizon Wireless In Deployment / 25-30 Cities by End 2010 / Nationwide 2013

    LteMaps.org | Mapping LTE Deployments and if true, there is no reason for me to wait for a LTE phone since I usually update every year. I wonder if the LTE coverage map (would that be the beginning or the end of 2013?) will look just like the 3G coverage map does now by then. Right now it looks like just a few cities and not a very large land area beyond the city limits.
  6. New2u
    Offline

    New2u DF Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2009
    Messages:
    3,631
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Tallahassee, Fl
    LTE is more cost effective for what they currently have, WiMAX is more costly but when they upgrade to the next gen WiMAX, they can take advantage of alot of the same equipment because most of it is still the same technology. In the end After LTE is upgraded to it's next counter-part, i would put both prices at about the same in the end. Speeds on the LTE are supposed to be faster then WiMAX just because it's a newer tech, but the speeds aren't a super huge difference, once they are both upgraded again i believe WiMAX has a small advantage over LTE. But then again it all comes down to money, if you save more with LTE, you can afford to put up a few more towers or lease a few more towers, which is better signal for us.

    Last edited: Oct 22, 2010
  7. chaz.ring
    Offline

    chaz.ring New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Michigan
    hmmmm... I guess as I have not yet seen or installed the "upgraded" equipment yet they could be the same.

    But as of right now they are not the same technologies at all.....

    Wimax uses mostly microwave tech. via clearwire with sprint together.

    LTE uses the same antenna's they always have just retro'd to a low 700mhz band via diplexed signal from the same lines running their 850 and 1900 bands... same antenna's too... Yeah, the topside jumper routing is getting to be a bit tedious...lol
  8. Quicksilver7714
    Offline

    Quicksilver7714 DF Super Moderator Rescue Squad Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    2,444
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Wimax2 has just been shown off in Japan I believe it can stream uncompressed 1080p video, and speeds were stated at
    330Mbps. Here is a link to engadget "http://i.engadget.com/2010/10/04/samsung-showing-off-330mbps-wimax-2-mobile-broadband-over-at-cea/"
    Trying out Sprint for a month. Sent from my Evo using Tapatalk. 4G is pointless when you don't live in one of the few available network areas.
  9. richphitzwell
    Offline

    richphitzwell New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    14
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Any word on what the potential phones will be? I have to assume they will all be backwards compatible with 3g and lower as well. Im telling one of my clients unless he needs a smartphone now, wait until next year for the 4g phones as we are slated to be 4g live mid next year.
  10. kodiak799
    Offline

    kodiak799 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    4,900
    Likes Received:
    251
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Yep, this is the most anticipated tech for me to date....Well, maybe plasma tv's.

    I think I've seen May on the handsets, but I'm really hoping it will be sooner. That's still over 6 months away! Pretty much forever in the smartphone world these days.
  11. czerdrill
    Offline

    czerdrill New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    4,828
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    0
    5-12MB down? yes, please haha. how much are they gonna charge for this though? Anyone know?
  12. chaz.ring
    Offline

    chaz.ring New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Messages:
    170
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Michigan
    Hard to say what premium we'll have to pay for it. I hope its not so steep that I just overlook it as an option, seeing how I installed LTE on the tower I can see from my house.dancedroid