Nearly 75% of Android Devices Can Be Accessed By Google If Court Ordered

DroidModderX

Super Moderator
Staff member
Premium Member
Joined
Oct 6, 2011
Messages
5,782
Reaction score
2,133

It seems that older versions of Android which do not use full disk encryption can be remotely accessed by Google. The passcodes can also be bypassed using any of a variety of forensic techniques. Google is even able to reset passcodes remotely. This can be done if Google is court ordered. This can be used to assist law enforcement to grab info off a device, or to view the full contents of a device. This can not be done on devices running Android 5.0 or higher which use full disk encryption. This means that almost 75% of all Android devices are remotely accessible.

via TheNextWeb
 

liftedplane

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2011
Messages
2,303
Reaction score
793
Location
Washington State
that's a little bit scary. I wonder if they added the full disk encryption to fix this. I hope that's the reason at least.
 

Jeffrey

Premium Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
6,645
Reaction score
3,511
Location
Thailand
Current Phone Model
iPhone 7 Plus JB
I seem to recall reading something about Apple being forced [court ordered] to access an older iPhone. Apple claims their phones no longer have a backdoor access as it creates vulnerability.
 

MissionImprobable

Silver Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
142
You are correct. Newer iOS versions can't be accessed by Apple no matter what according to their statements. As for Android, it's interesting to see how many devices are still 'open' to this. I wonder if user encryption matters in those cases or not.
 

akhenax

Silver Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2010
Messages
1,714
Reaction score
380
Location
NY
What does full disk encryption have to do with remotely accessing a device? If they can authenticate with a master google id/key, then they have full access whether I have full disk encryption or not...right??
 

tech_head

Silver Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2010
Messages
661
Reaction score
203
Location
Western Hemisphere
The justification is scary. "We can't solve crimes if we can't get access."
It's for the victims. Yeah, don't believe the hype. "We will get a warrant." Like they always have in the past? Right.
Read the whole document, it's a scary diatribe and justification for them to be able to search.

The supreme court has said that a cellphone is an extension of private space. They cannot compel you to unlock your phone.
So what they would like to do is circumvent the supreme court by reducing security and having the manufacturers provide them with a back door.

They then go on to say that foreign governments wuld need to ask for access from the US if they are US companies. THis is a flat out lie. Those other governments would do nothing less than prohibit Apple or Google from doing business in their locales unless they get the same access as the US.

I don't have anything to hide but, that doesn't mean I'm okay with them looking.
Just say no.
 
Top