Google Tightening Grip on Android - Less Open, "Open Source"

Discussion in 'Android News' started by dgstorm, Mar 31, 2011.

  1. JeffDenver

    JeffDenver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +4
    I mean, really, the fact that the only way Microsoft can get people to use Bing is by FORCING them to use it really says all that needs to be said about the product.
     
  2. jacobbond

    jacobbond New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    22
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Florianopolis, Brazil
    Ratings:
    +0
    Yes get rid of the bloatware!!! I don't think Google is trying to be evil, they are just trying to protect the integrity of their product. Yes it is open source but that doesn't mean companies are free to modify it to make it something not even resembling Android anymore.
     
  3. cpjr

    cpjr Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Ratings:
    +0
    I think its very funny that this is exactly what Apple has always done and EVERYBODY HATES them for it.

    Now, Googles is swaying that way and everyone says "I think it will be a good thing".

    Personally, it doesnt really bother me. I am just amazed at how people react, not because of the issue, but because of "who" the issue is.
     
  4. VannMann

    VannMann Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    48
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    NC
    Ratings:
    +0
    I didn't write that, lol. I think you quoted wrong.
     
  5. Martin030908

    Martin030908 DF Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Messages:
    8,773
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Ratings:
    +0
    Same boat here. Google is synonymous with "search". Yahoo went the way of the dinosaur and I see no reason why Bing won't. Don't get me wrong, competition is good...

    Even with the iPhone... they just "Google" it. dancedroid
     
  6. JeffDenver

    JeffDenver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +4
    On its worst day Google is not as bossy as Apple is. Not by a long shot.

    How many apps has Google banned so far because they dont like the content? How many multi-media platforms has Google banned because of an ideological agenda?

    Sorry, Apple is way way worse. Even now.
     
  7. cpjr

    cpjr Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Ratings:
    +0
    Did I say they were the same? Did I even try to imply it...no.

    This is the direction they are going. End of story. Doesnt mean they will ever be as bad, doesnt mean they wont.

    So calm down.
     
  8. JeffDenver

    JeffDenver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +4
    Sorry, it was actually wingdo. The quote button auto-filled everything. I am going back to quoting manually.
     
  9. JeffDenver

    JeffDenver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2010
    Messages:
    924
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +4
    I disagree that they are going in the direction of banning apps they dont like or platforms they dont like. I have seen zero evidence of that.
     
  10. cpjr

    cpjr Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Ratings:
    +0
    Ok, lets get off the app discussion, since this thread has nothing to do with it.

    We are talking about the OS, Apple's OS has a deathgrip on it and now Google is trying to tighten the belt on theirs. How is that not heading in the same direction?
     
  11. SkullOne

    SkullOne Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    139
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +0
    This is both good and bad. I'm all for this though depending on what Google wants to do.

    Google has made it very clear in the past that they want Android to be a standalone object in the Android world. Anything else should be an installable program. Sense, Blur and Touchwiz should be able to be turned off completely or even uninstalled.

    I think what we're seeing is Google wanting companies like HTC, Moto, and Samsung to not muck around in the source code by building Sense, Blur, Touchwiz directly into the system and causing dependencies. That way updates can happen faster. If the base code on the device is still relatively close to what is on AOSP then updates comes quicker.

    Look at the Tmobile Theme Engine on Github. That's the way themes should be done. That's what I think Google vision for Android is. Keep Android open for all to use but get people to modularize it. That way fragmentation is kept to a minimum.

    Sure you have EOL devices that can't run newer versions but that's to be expected. The Droid is a perfect example. However, I also think the Droid got a fair number of updates during its lifetime. 2.0.0 was stock. 2.0.1 came next. Then 2.1. Then 2.2. Then 2.2.1 and 2.2.2. That's pretty good when you think about.

    I also think part of this is to stop companies like Samsung from stringing their customers along in order to get the updates out there. Once again this would start bringing fragmentation under control.

    Just don't forget that every system has fragmentation. It's inevitable. The key is controlling it to the best of your ability and if Google needs to exert a little bit of control to do it then I say so be it.
     
  12. Martin030908

    Martin030908 DF Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Messages:
    8,773
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Ratings:
    +0
    I don't think it's 'end of story' either.

    There needed to be some accountability of Google's part to ensure a high quality product... I think this is a great step toward it.

    Is it all rainbows and unicorns? No, there are negatives to it as well, but overall I think it will only improve the end product for consumers.
     
  13. cpjr

    cpjr Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Ratings:
    +0
    PS- And the more of a grip they get on the OS, the more "closed" it becomes, the more they will restrict the apps that run on it in the long run.
     
  14. Martin030908

    Martin030908 DF Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Messages:
    8,773
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    151
    Ratings:
    +0
    Well said. I'm thinking along the same lines.
     
  15. cpjr

    cpjr Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2009
    Messages:
    1,596
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    66
    Location:
    Atlanta
    Ratings:
    +0
    Dont get me wrong, I think they need it. I agree it will drive quality up, which is something that is lacking on android. I am for it, I was just making a point.
     
Search tags for this page

rom gripper doesn't work

,
touchwiz should be banned