eh, as much as i would like the above to be true lets not forget the bionic on display at CES was only using 1 core of 2.. to me that may be that comparing core to core the thunderbolt is better but 2 is always better than one.. i just dont care to wait for a dual core with less ram than a single core and coming from OG Droid helps to.. lol
Eh, Know much about computers? Dual cores only have the advantage if the programs can run multi-threaded. If not then a single core with a higher clock speed will have the advantage.
No sarcasm here, but are you saying with both cores activated the bionic wont run faster/smoother than we saw (maybe not you) at the CES event?
keep in mind most people dont get a high end phones to just take pictures and txt message so im not sure i get your point.
Which phone is clocked higher than the other i thought they were both 1.0 ghz? i was pointing out that the TB is still faster imo but you cant tell me when you are multi-tasking its going to stay as smooth as the bionic.. or is that exactly what you are trying to tell me?
clarify for me what you consider an advantage, i dont think the fastest processor has the best advantage i think the smoothest most battery conservative has the best advantage imo..
if i had the choice of something that ran 2x speed but half the battery i would choose the alternative as long as any apps i go through remain smooth and dont bog the phone up.