Jasonjohns
Member
Iphone discussion has nothing to do with this thread.
I was almost set on the Bionic until reading that. Now I will be considering the HTC. Only worried about a couple things, the battery life of the TB and the inferior processor. Otherwise, unlocked bootloader and earlier release date, very tempting.
Sent from my Droid using DroidForums App
Here is some info to help people make comparisons and decide: I think it mostly comes down to Blur vs. Sense, and dual core vs. single core, and love for Moto vs. HTC.
Thunderbolt advantages over Bionic – 32 MB microSD card included (very good value), 768MB RAM, Sense 2.0 (preference for some, but majority seem to prefer it to other skins), kickstand (although you can’t charge while using it because of port location), external speaker, releasing sooner, better front facing camera, FM radio, unlocked bootloader (merely speculation right now, but it would be easier to root, rom), HTC gets new update support the fastest, more attractive design (personal preference, some may disagree, but they both look great anyway)
Disadvantages – lower quality screen (but still pretty decent improvement over Inc and EVO), only a single core processor (but new 2nd generation snapdragon is still very good, can overclock well, looks very snappy in videos, and will be plenty fast for most people), less internal memory, no HDMI port (but HTC will allegedly release a device to use with non-DLNA compatible TVs to make up for this) will likely get poor battery life unless you buy the extended one because the stock one is small, fewer accessories available at launch
Bionic advantages over Thunderbolt – dual core processor (while it will certainly be faster than single, it sounds like the software and Android won’t be able to quite fully optimize it until Honeycomb is released and games and apps are developed to fully utilize the power, which is two versions down the road, so this will not be a dealbreaker for many people), better quality screen, HDMI, bigger battery (huge plus for everyone!), more internal memory, gets better accessory selection at launch (eg. docks)
Disadvantages – microSD card not included, less RAM (big disappointment for many people), MotoBlur (lighter version may be ok, we’ll have to wait and see), no kickstand or external speaker, releasing later, front facing camera not as good (but comparable to iPhone’s), no FM radio, locked bootloader (hard to root and rom, can be a very big deal to some, but not to others who won’t)
Hope this helps! All other specs are pretty comparable on both models. I decided to go with the Thunderbolt in early March instead of waiting until late April, May, or even early June for the Bionic. I really like Sense over Blur, and it just looks more polished to me in the pics and videos. I don't really NEED dual core for my purposes (yet), and that is the main thing that would swing me toward it, plus the HTC has more RAM which will help make up for lack of a dual core and the 2nd gen Snapdragon is much improved over the first, so it will be pretty fast as it is. I'll just get the extended battery on the HTC, and I'm sure their new SLCD screen is good enough, and then I'll be happy with it for a year until the second generation of dual core phones are released next year (whether they be by HTC, Moto, Sammy, or LG) that are much improved spec-wise and can more fully take advantage of dual core technology.
I'd definitely like to see how the other manufacturers' dual cores stack up against NVIDIA's Tegra 2 first before making a decision (namely Qualcomm's newest one and Samsung's Orion processors). Like with computers when the first dual cores came out, it will take a couple rounds of devices to get the kinks worked out and figure out how best to use both cores in conjunction with each other. The Tegra 2 is great from what I've been reading on it, but just because its the first in line to the game doesn't mean its going to win in the long run.
Here is some info to help people make comparisons and decide: I think it mostly comes down to Blur vs. Sense, and dual core vs. single core, and love for Moto vs. HTC.
Disadvantages – microSD card not included, less RAM (big disappointment for many people), MotoBlur (lighter version may be ok, we’ll have to wait and see), no kickstand or external speaker, releasing later, front facing camera not as good (but comparable to iPhone’s), no FM radio, locked bootloader (hard to root and rom, can be a very big deal to some, but not to others who won’t)
Although it is less Ram Which is 512MB DDR2. It is twice as fast and faster then The 768MB RAM of the ThunderBolt.. MicroSD cards have always with Motorola Smartphones. For me I do not care if it has a Kickstand or Not when I have the Docking Station. We do not know if it has an FM Radio or not. The Phone at CES was unfinished. As for the front facing camera we have not seen any video of it.. We have to wait for the finished product.. Other then these things Pretty good Info...:clap:
+1
very good. i want the moto but if the bootloader is unlocked then im def getting thunderbolt. cm7 baby!:icon_ banana:
but if they unlock bionic then thats the one fo sho