Samsung Officially Adds iPhone 5 to Lawsuit; Also Galaxy Tab 10.1 Sales Ban Lifted

dgstorm

Editor in Chief
Staff member
Premium Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
10,991
Reaction score
3,961
Location
Austin, TX
samsung-apple-lawsuit-more.jpeg

It looks like we might be seeing the first inklings of a "turnaround" in the patent wars for Samsung against Apple. At the very list, Samsung is striking back, and developing their strategy. First, in a fairly surprising move, Judge Lucy Koh reversed her own earlier decision and lifted the sales ban against the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1. Before the trial in California that shocked the tech world even began, Judge Koh had ruled it was likely that a Jury would find that the Galaxy Tab 10.1 copied the iPad, so she preemptively banned the device.

As it turns out, the jury did not agree with her assessment and didn't include the G-Tab 10.1 on their list of infringing devices. After the trial, Samsung appealed to a higher court to lift the sales ban. This court kicked it back down to Judge Koh. She just lifted the sales ban late yesterday on the device. Additionally, it is possible that Samsung could get Apple to pay up $2.6 Million dollars for lost revenue of the product while it was banned. Sadly, that is a paltry sum compared to the $1.05 Billion dollar verdict that Samsung was saddled with from the loss in the California court vs. Apple.

Luckily, Samsung's newest strategy just went official today as well. Previously we reported that Samsung intended to add the iPhone 5 to their lawsuits against Apple infringing on LTE patents. That is now official, as Samsung added the phone to their legal case. Samsung claims that the iPhone 5 infringes two standards patents and six features patents.

Unfortunately, it will be some time for this new strategy to bear any fruit for Samsung. Their court date for the case isn't until 2014. That's a long time to wait, and several more product launches later for Apple. Still, Sammy is defending themselves in the only way left to them now. Here's a quote from the company,

“We have always preferred to compete in the marketplace with our innovative products, rather than in courtrooms. However, Apple continues to take aggressive legal measures that will limit market competition. Under these circumstances, we have little choice but to take the steps necessary to protect our innovations and intellectual property rights,” Samsung said in a statement.

Source: AndroidAuthority
 

armeddroid

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
1,637
Reaction score
30
Location
Traffic Capital
She had the authority to ban the device but couldnt lift it afterwards.
"Judge Koh had ruled it was likely* that a Jury would find that the Galaxy Tab 10.1 copied the iPad, so she preemptively* banned the device."

*Bonehead
 

94lt1

Super Moderator
Staff member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
17,041
Reaction score
3,997
Location
SE TX
Current Phone Model
Droid Turbo 2
She had the authority to ban the device but couldnt lift it afterwards.
"Judge Koh had ruled it was likely* that a Jury would find that the Galaxy Tab 10.1 copied the iPad, so she preemptively* banned the device."

*Bonehead

Seems to me that the galaxy tab is light years ahead of the ipad3. I have the ipad3 and the galaxy tab is way ahead.. except in recording music... dang it..

But none of that will be taken into consideration... :rolleyes:

Apple wars... food fight!! :D
 

Alastrionia

Sourcery Themer / Designr
Premium Member
Theme Developer
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
358
Reaction score
4
Location
Sunnyside, WA
2014!! Apple gets a date in months and Samsung has to wait years. WTF

ya that is a bit fishy isn't it?

though just the fact that it's there means that Samsung can try to push harder between now and then
there's always potential for a change in date / venue which could work in Sammy's favor.

About time someone took a bite outta Apple, and in a big way. LTE patents are the best ammo they got.
 

johnomaz

Silver Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
3,187
Reaction score
633
Location
Central Valley, California
Current Phone Model
Google Pixel 2XL
ya that is a bit fishy isn't it?

though just the fact that it's there means that Samsung can try to push harder between now and then
there's always potential for a change in date / venue which could work in Sammy's favor.

About time someone took a bite outta Apple, and in a big way. LTE patents are the best ammo they got.

But by 2014, its plenty of time for Apple to use a different LTE radio in future phones. The iPhone 5 will be about to retire so it won't even matter. Fishy isn't the half of what it smells like.
 

armeddroid

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
1,637
Reaction score
30
Location
Traffic Capital
But by 2014, its plenty of time for Apple to use a different LTE radio in future phones. The iPhone 5 will be about to retire so it won't even matter. Fishy isn't the half of what it smells like.

Isnt Googlerola supposed to be jumping in?
Where are they at with their extensive patents?
Perhaps they can shut Apple down before then.
 

Nemo Aeternamn

Droid X Rescue Squad
Premium Member
Rescue Squad
Joined
Sep 10, 2011
Messages
792
Reaction score
12
Location
Mo-ab
Re: Samsung Officially Adds iPhone 5 to Lawsuit; Also Galaxy Tab 10.1 Sales Ban Lifte

Isnt Googlerola supposed to be jumping in?
Where are they at with their extensive patents?
Perhaps they can shut Apple down before then.

Googlerla is suing them over WiFi patents... but I haven't heard that it includes the the iPhone 5 because they filed it before it was released/announced

Cellar Door

"Who are you people and where is my horse?"
 

armeddroid

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
1,637
Reaction score
30
Location
Traffic Capital

MissionImprobable

Silver Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
2,040
Reaction score
142
It is a bit suspicious that Apple gets their cases fast-tracked to the extent that they do. Regardless, like Apple, when this goes to court in 2014, Samsung will be able to amend their claim to add any new devices that infringe. That is supposing that Apple hasn't found a way around things by that point.
 
Top