There has been a lot of discussion recently about 4G / LTE / WiMax - whose 4G is "real" 4G? Whose isn't? Whose is faster? Whose has the most potential in the long run?
The way I see it, none of that really matters, and is mostly semantics (I get that there are technical differences as well, but the typical end user doesn't care). What does matter is whose 4G lives up to expectations and does it consistently, and early tests (in the Seattle area only) are showing that Verizon is starting off strongly in the lead.
A couple of excerpts from an article on wired.com:
"Their findings showed that Verizon’s LTE network performed at a 100 percent data-success rate. Its average data speeds were between four and 14.5 times faster than competitors, and average upload speeds were between 4.7 and 49.3 times faster.
The phone models tested included the HTC Thunderbolt (Verizon), HTC Inspire (AT&T), HTC Evo (Sprint) and Samsung Galaxy S (T-Mobile). RootMetrics’ CEO Paul Griff said that the smartphone model and its hardware had very little to do with 4G performance — that performance is almost all network related."
"RootMetrics was careful to point out that merely achieving high data speeds doesn’t mean much unless it happens on a regular basis, though. It found that Verizon’s 4G download speeds were greater than 10 Mbps about 90 percent of the time, and their upload speeds were between 5 and 10 Mbps 100 percent of the time."
"And Verizon’s average upload speeds were faster than every other carrier’s average download speeds by 37 percent.
A graph of how often each 4G service achieved a certain range of download speeds (from 0-500 Kbps to greater than 10 Mbps) shows Verizon dominating the high end, AT&T spending most of its time in the lower half, and Sprint and T-Mobile’s services ranging widely throughout."
In my personal opinion, the fact that Verizon is consistent is just as, if not more important than the fact that it's the fastest. What good are high speeds if it's inconsistent? The phone models tested included the HTC Thunderbolt (Verizon), HTC Inspire (AT&T), HTC Evo (Sprint) and Samsung Galaxy S (T-Mobile). RootMetrics’ CEO Paul Griff said that the smartphone model and its hardware had very little to do with 4G performance — that performance is almost all network related."
"RootMetrics was careful to point out that merely achieving high data speeds doesn’t mean much unless it happens on a regular basis, though. It found that Verizon’s 4G download speeds were greater than 10 Mbps about 90 percent of the time, and their upload speeds were between 5 and 10 Mbps 100 percent of the time."
"And Verizon’s average upload speeds were faster than every other carrier’s average download speeds by 37 percent.
A graph of how often each 4G service achieved a certain range of download speeds (from 0-500 Kbps to greater than 10 Mbps) shows Verizon dominating the high end, AT&T spending most of its time in the lower half, and Sprint and T-Mobile’s services ranging widely throughout."
See the full wired.com article here: Verizon’s 4G Network Leaves Other Carriers in the Dust | Gadget Lab | Wired.com
Link to the actual test and results (not working real well, but is legit): http://rootmetrics.com/pr/reports/2011/20110320_Seattle_4G_Study.pdf