Regarding the source being absolutely terrible, "The International Business Times is an online publication based in New York City comprising 10 national editions and seven languages. The publication, sometimes called IBTimes or IBT, offers news, opinion, and editorial commentary on business and business-related stories. It is ranked by Alexa as the fourth-most visited site among business newspapers" from Wikipedia.
Yet, the author cites no sources in her Motorola section. The whole paragraph about Motorola is nothing but speculation. Every other manufacturer she talks about has plenty of links backing up her claims, but the Motorola one contains two links...to Wikipedia. Hmm.
As sajokaz has already said, no one knows if the Razr M will get 4.3. The only way we'll know for sure is if Google/Motorola comes out and says it will, or if we start seeing soak test/dev build leaks.
EDIT - I realize this post my sound a bit hostile. My point is, the article offers no concrete information when it comes to Motorola phones. It seems like, unfortunately, the article is just sensationalist "reporting" that exists merely to gain the most amount of clicks and views for the advertisers on it's page.
I also realize there are a lot of people who are alpha personalities and jump on anything that does not line up with their reality.
I was SIMPLY posting something I came across. After being in the business community for 45 years (more than most here have been out of diapers), I am able to discern fact from speculation.
I also realize there are a lot of people who are alpha personalities and jump on anything that does not line up with their reality.
I was SIMPLY posting something I came across. After being in the business community for 45 years (more than most here have been out of diapers), I am able to discern fact from speculation.
Should I advise Fionna Agomuoh that you do not think much of her reporting?
After I bought the Galaxy Nexus shortly after release, I wasted considerable time obsessing over updates. I hoped that newer versions of Android would magically cure the bad radios and other defects inherent to the device. The updates didn't help.
People who constantly flashed custom ROMS were always claiming great improvements. Over time I have become quite skeptical of these supposed improvements. I suspect wishful thinking was involved.
The other thing I learned was that even with a "developer" phone like the Galaxy Nexus, Verizon doesn't give a damn. Don't ever buy a phone from this company with the expectation that you will get an update during the usual 2 year contract cycle.
I'm sure she's already gotten that feedback, since anyone who reads that article will realize how much of a joke it is.