I'm almost sorry that I asked the question. So what is Moto's, or should I say Google's position in all of this? First all of the Razr/Lapdock users that bought these devices with the expectation of certain functionalities, prior to the release of ICS and Webtop 3.0 got neutered by the change from GB to ICS and Webtop 2.0 to 3.0 from a functionality perspective. No more Firefox and other functionality. Now the second blow comes along with no viable mitigation to replace a functioning application for some future configuration which has yet to receive universal introduction.
Chrome is supposedly now going to be included in the newer releases of ICS (based upon my reading of those using a .215 leak version), replacing the built in browser in ICS .211 and prior GB, etc. (Again, no surprise in light of who now owns Moto Mobility). In the same vain that Chrome has it's own built in version of Java, perhaps it should now be built to have its own built in version of a Flash equivalent that will work on all devices where the updated software is being forced into acceptance. You can say that no one said that you are "forced" to update, but then again, I do not recall receiving any communications from my vendor telling me why I shouldn't. Does anyone else see something very wrong with this whole picture?