This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I can say with a fair degree of confidence (haven't done any methodical testing) that 3G eats up more battery than WiFi. On both the iPhone and the Droid, I find that leaving WiFi on gives me better battery life than if I had turned off WiFi and relied on 3G.
Do you SERIOUSLY think a bunch of Droid owners off the street are gonna' have a clue about a question even a Motorola Droid design engineer would have to do calculations to answer?
Opinions - sure. But opinions are like $%&!_#, everyone's got one.
Actually I find mathmatical calculations to be BS, I would rather have realworld opinions from realworld users who would be using the phone the same way I would.
Mathmatical calculations are like **sh)(&%, every scientist thinks his is right
The problem is, very few real-world users actually write down any real data on usage... They mostly give their opinions, which may be incorrect.
But, based on what I've read in various places, it would seem to me that WiFi is a bit more efficient, most of the time.
But I don't use WiFi because a couple of my widgets don't work with it. And the difference between 3G and WiFi is pretty slim, at any rate -- otherwise, there'd be no argument about which is more efficient. It'd be very clear that one is better than the other.
It depends on the quality of the signal. The weaker the signal, from my experience, the more current will be drawn from the battery to try to boost the strength of the receiver/transmitter.
Do tests of your own. A guy sitting in the 3rd floor basement of a building 6 ft from a WiFi router will say WiFi is better. :icon_ banana: