Markee
Member
Can anyone explain the logic for not supporting flash..
Markee said:Can anyone explain the logic for not supporting flash..
Well if you're going to point fingers about who is responsible for flash's decline then you want to point it at Apple. Apple was the one to completely drop flash from the iPhone and went with newer video codecs built into HTML5. Flash got a brief boost when they got Android to get behind them and advertised flash as an advantage over the iPhone. But increasingly flash is becoming less viable for the future.
The death nail was Adobe dropping mobile support though. Google wants to keep innovating and improving Android, but how can they do that if they're expected to work with old flash software that can't keep up? Manufacturers play a part in that too, but they realized that supporting flash would be more trouble than it would be worth. They would be working double time to work around flash and keeping it working while it just got older and more out of date. If I were a manufacturer I wouldn't want to keep flash alive by doing extra work on my part either. If Adobe wants flash to survive then they should put some effort into a mobile presence; no one wants to back a horse that just gave up their whole fight after making a big deal about Apple dropping them. In the end manufacturers decided Apple was right and ditched flash. You can still get flash in google play, but manufacturers are leaving the rest up to Adobe to keep users happy.
Though the reason flash has even held on this long is because there are still a million people out there using Windows XP and older versions of Internet Explorer which can't run HTML5. So flash can still reach the most people online. But once IE 6 and 7 die hards upgrade to better browsers then flash won't really be necessary anymore. On mobile I'd say they're just ahead of the curve on where the industry is already headed in the future.
Then once web developers see that the tides are moving away from flash they'll dump it for HTML5 as well.