Verizon CFO Flip Flops on Title II Discussions; Claims He Was Taken Out of Context

Discussion in 'Android News' started by dgstorm, Jan 26, 2015.

  1. dgstorm

    dgstorm Editor in Chief
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    11,016
    Likes Received:
    3,979
    Trophy Points:
    823
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +4,254
    [​IMG]

    Not too long ago, we shared a report detailing how hypocritical AT&T is regarding Title II classification. On the one hand, they argue against Title II, claiming they can't be regulated by the FTC because they are a common carrier under Title II. Yet, on the other hand, they have also been arguing that they will be harmed if the FCC classifies their Internet service under Title II.

    Today's report clearly shows that AT&T isn't the only big carrier who likes to flip-flop on this issue. Big Red, aka Verizon, is currently performing the same song and dance. Verizon’s CFO, Fran Shammo, recently held a discussion at an investor conference. In that conference, he was asked the following by John Hodulik – Analyst for UBS North America,

    Shammo's response was,

    This seems to clearly indicate that Shammo believes Title II classification will NOT hurt Verizon, or really affect them much at all. Despite that, he has now completely backtracked from this statement in an article of the Washington Post. He is instead saying his comments were taken out of context, and this is what he actually believes,

    He added that he believes strong net neutrality rules would "jeopardize our investment and the development of innovation in broadband Internet and related services." He elaborated, "So when I said before and misquoted on the fact that it would not hurt our investment, I was talking about 2015. But if this piece of [regulation] were to pass, I can absolutely assure you it would certainly change the way we then view our investment in our networks."

    Hmmm... which one is it? You can't really have it both ways. Either an investor should reconsider investing in Verizon because Title II will hurt the company (which is highly unlikely), or an investor should not worry, because Title II will not have much of an impact on Verizon's future growth (as Shammo previously said himself).

    For your reference, here is a link to the full transcript of the investor interview this story is referring to: Verizon Communications VZ Presents at UBS 42nd Annual Global Media and Communications Conference Transcript Seeking Alpha

    Here's that Washington Post source link for his current comments: Did Congress the media and the FCC all misunderstand what Verizon said on net neutrality Verizon thinks so. - The Washington Post
     
  2. lloydstrans

    lloydstrans Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    12,349
    Likes Received:
    2,092
    Trophy Points:
    678
    Ratings:
    +2,137
    Shammo has a political future in the makings.

    We must...We must...increase our boost
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. 94lt1

    94lt1 Super Moderator
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    17,152
    Likes Received:
    4,040
    Trophy Points:
    1,138
    Location:
    SE TX
    Ratings:
    +4,530
    Current Phone Model:
    Droid Turbo 2
    The old double talk.. Triple meaning.. Lol
     
  4. mountainbikermark

    mountainbikermark Super Moderator
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,455
    Likes Received:
    3,886
    Trophy Points:
    1,563
    Ratings:
    +4,348
    Whole lotta words without saying a thing.

    Support Our Troops !!!
    <><
    Beast Mode 4
     
  5. trestevenson

    trestevenson Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2010
    Messages:
    474
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings:
    +33
    Current Phone Model:
    Huawei Nexus 6P
    It's no surprise he would paint a rosier picture at an investor meeting!