Study Shows Slow Adoption Rate of Digital Wallets Due to Lack of Understanding

dgstorm

Editor in Chief
Staff member
Premium Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
10,992
Reaction score
3,961
Location
Austin, TX
digital_wallet_awareness.png

Supposedly a new study indicates that a bright future is in store for digital wallet services, like Google Wallet and ISIS, but for now the adoption rate is still slow due to a perception problem. The study from ComScore concludes the primary problem with the slow adoption of digital wallets is that people don't understand the concept yet, or they don't fully understand the benefits. The other factor is simply lack of awareness of the tech altogether. Only 51% of U.S. consumers are even aware of the technology, and only 12% of the folks who know about it have actually used it. Here's a quote with some additional detail,

ComScore analyzed data from a panel of 1 million U.S. consumers and two separate surveys of U.S. Internet users in November 2012 to arrive at its conclusions. For purposes of the study, the firm defined the digital wallet as an entity that stores a virtual copy of wallet content for use in online or offline transactions. The full report is available for purchase, but CNET obtained a copy from ComScore for review.

"Digital wallets represent an innovative technology that has not yet reached critical mass among consumers due to a variety of factors, including low awareness and a muddied understanding of their benefits," ComScore Payments Practice Leader Andrea Jacobs said.

Should the digital wallet find a foothold with consumers, it will be PayPal's market to lose. Seventy-two percent of survey respondents said they were aware of the eBay-owned payment facilitator's digital wallet and 48 percent indicated that they had used the technology. Compare that to the web and mobile wallet from Google, which placed a distant second with 48 percent awareness and an unremarkable 8 percent usage among survey participants.

The rest of the digital wallet-makers, ranging from credit card companies such as MasterCard and Visa to startups like Square and LevelUp, all scored so low it's safe to say that people have no idea what these offerings are or why they should use them.

Part of the digital wallet adoption problem appears to be linked to security concerns around hacking or phone and identity theft, issues that providers need to do a better job at addressing. ComScore found that 93 percent of respondents said they would prefer to use a digital wallet that has to be unlocked before use, though just 57 percent were aware that this type of feature was available -- even after they reviewed each brand's website.

Jacobs, however, hasn't written off the future potential of digital wallets. "There was a time when consumers were reluctant to use ATMs for similar reasons, and, today, look at how far we've come since the 1970s and 1980s," she said. "It would seem that the future is bright for digital wallets, but it will require deliberate execution of strategies such as sound marketing for this technology to realize its full potential."

What do you guys think of the concept of digital wallets? The most common complaint is security issues, yet a way to digitally pay for your meal at a restaurant without having to give your card to a "complete stranger," should be far more appealing in theory. What do you guys think of the analogy comparing digital wallets to ATM cards? Does it hold water?

Thanks for the tip!

Source: CNET
 
Last edited:

ntrddragn

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
846
Reaction score
7
Slow adoption cuz ppl don't know about it period. Google doesn't do a good job at "marketing" the concept. And we have vzw blocking the concept. If this was on an iPhone they would market the hell out it. I mean the made a commercial for noise cancelation mic for goodness sake.

Google doesnt market how safe it is also since ppl r concern about security. I did saw a video how someone grab the cc # off of a lot of ppl with the pay pass credit card without seeing their card. He just tap their wallet or purse and was able to grab it. And they were told to call the cc company to never send them a cc like that again. Or were instructed to remove the magnet chip.
 

jstafford1

Super Moderator
Rescue Squad
Joined
Nov 15, 2009
Messages
11,185
Reaction score
1,671
Location
Hebron, Oh.
Twitter
jstaff79
I would use it but I live in the 1900's it seems here in central Ohio.

Sent from Democles Base.
 

johnomaz

Silver Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
3,187
Reaction score
633
Location
Central Valley, California
Current Phone Model
Google Pixel 2XL
I have no plan on using it because if you happen to lose your phone, the battery dies or it breaks, you are out of luck. You may have the actual plastic cards at home somewhere, but if they are at home and your phone gets stolen at a bar, you're out of luck. I'm not talking about the thief spending your money, but you no longer have a means to pay for anything. There are times where my phone will randomly eat through its battery in a few hours when normally I can have it on for 15 hours of use and have 30% when I go to bed. Also, very few places take the NFC payment methods. Also, what is the big deal with using NFC anyways? I forget the credit card company that put an NFC chip in their cards so you could tap and not swipe it and it never caught on. Now I have to get my phone out, unlock it, open the app, hope your data connection is good and then tap your phone. Or I could get my wallet out and swipe my card.

I just don't see it as an easier or more efficient method of payment. I see it as a novelty, a conversation starter for your inner nerd. I get this is just my opinion, but checks came out because cash was inconvenient. Imagine carrying $5000 to BestBuy to buy something. A check was easier. Now, credit cards/debit cards came out because personal checks took forever in lines. I think using your phone is a step backwards in efficiency. I'd rather have a single card that has a flexible display on it (hurry up Samsung) where you could touch which account you want to use and either tap it via NFC or swipe it. No having to log in, nothing. Use a finger print reader so it knows its you before the purchase and use wireless charging tech at home to charge it. But even that would have draw backs.
 

kodiak799

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
6,146
Reaction score
827
Yeah I think there are a lot bigger reasons for slow adoption. #1 how widespread is it even at retailers? If it's anything much less than 95% then you still need to carry a CC so why bother?

Not sure about losing it since you could lose your wallet (although I'm far less likely to put my wallet on the table and leave it there where I forget it). Security I'm not so sure about, but there's also not a massive number of people doing online banking (especially for people over 40/50).

The battery dying is a great point.

But as far as convenience goes, this isn't any great saver. I still need my wallet for my license and petty cash (and a few insurance cards). So it's no big deal to carry a CC, and it's awfully quick and easy to swipe a CC (no pin).

Anyway, until it's acceptable everywhere (including airport security and the cops) to have a digital license on your phone, and the medical info (which I guess you could do) this tech is going nowhere. It has to be the WHOLE wallet, with everything accepted almost everywhere.
 
Last edited:

Dusty

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Messages
1,180
Reaction score
483
Location
DC/NoVA
Current Phone Model
Pixel 3XL
Credit cards weren't accepted everywhere overnight. Think of it as an added convenience that is there when you choose to use it. Why is that so bad?

As far as losing it... you can say the same thing about losing your wallet. At least with this they have to hack it to have any chance of getting any useful data, unlike your wallet where all a person has to do is open it and pull out your license and credit card.

Just like you carry cash for when you can't use a credit card this could just be an alternative. I use it quite often, by the way, when I stop at a 7-ll probably 3-4 times a week.

I like it.
 

kodiak799

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
6,146
Reaction score
827
Like I said, as long as we need a physical wallet for something or something else, there's absolutely no inconvenience related to a CC that can be improved upon. In that regard, and some others, digital wallets are an inferior alternative. That's the main reason adoption has been so slow and will be a long time before it's more than a novelty.
 

bazar6

Premium Member
Premium Member
Theme Developer
Joined
Dec 15, 2009
Messages
681
Reaction score
14
Location
MD
Website
www.imbazar.me
I'd be up for adopting it if retailers said theywill eventually adopt the technology. But they aren't because there's so many choices (Paypal, Wallet, ISIS, PayPass, etc), if they need to have a scanner for each platform, then thats a ton of money to try to make everyone happy; so wait it out for an industry standard (like what happened with HD-DVD vs BluRay)

And I think more people have used the Google Wallet software more ofen than they realize because you have to use it when you purchase anything through the Play Store... that may have been different than what the study was looking at, and it's most probably Google's fault for not branding and pushing Wallet more than it currently is.
 

dezymond

Tech Support Mod
Staff member
Premium Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
12,049
Reaction score
1,479
Location
Bay Area, California
Current Phone Model
Google Pixel
I did try it once and it was convenient, but if I happen to lose my phone I don't want to lose my "wallet" either:D That's my main concern, it's bad enough I've lost my phone, I don't want the added stress of contacting my CC companies.
 

ntrddragn

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
846
Reaction score
7
i used mine quite often before. I stop using it after switching ROMs and constantly having to use the work around since it was blocked by vzw. I got annoyed and worried that it wouldnt work when i go to use it. So I just stop.

I'll just wait until the iPhone has it and then it would be more acceptable to use it. LOL

here is the video i was speaking of..stuff like this would scare lots of ppl.

[video=youtube;xUwOtc3kZ-8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUwOtc3kZ-8[/video]
 

Dusty

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Messages
1,180
Reaction score
483
Location
DC/NoVA
Current Phone Model
Pixel 3XL
The video is kind of misleading in the fact that the information that they stole is the exact same info a store clerk gets with every transaction. You essentially hand that info out DAILY. If you think that a company's hiring process is a line of consumer defense just google "waiter or clerk arrested credit card fraud" and see how many stories pop up.
 

ntrddragn

Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
846
Reaction score
7
The video is kind of misleading in the fact that the information that they stole is the exact same info a store clerk gets with every transaction. You essentially hand that info out DAILY. If you think that a company's hiring process is a line of consumer defense just google "waiter or clerk arrested credit card fraud" and see how many stories pop up.

I agree. I'm just saying that these kind of videos scare lots of ppl. They would hesitate to be early adopter of this kind of technology.
 

PereDroid

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Messages
5,908
Reaction score
3,681
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Current Phone Model
Moto Turbo 2
Shortened for brevity

Totally agree with John.
I have to carry my wallet anyway.
And some people here are saying "but you could lose your wallet, too". Sure I could. But my wallet could survive a 3 story fall. Can my phone survive a 4 foot drop?
(signed, the guy who has broken 3 phones and 2 tablets)
I've never dropped my phone in a toilet, but I know someone that did. Wallet can survive that.
Not to even mention what I don't think anyone mentioned here: privacy.
I don't care that Google knows everything I buy in Play. I don't care that Amazon knows every purchase I make there. I don't care that the grocery store tracks every food purchase.
But do we really want ONE company to know EVERY purchase we make in life? For what? So you can MARKET MORE **** TO ME?
Come on. You KNOW that's why Google wants you to use the wallet. Not because it's going to be easy for you. Because they want MOAR MARKETING DATA! Mwhahahaha!
Stop it Google. Stop trying to own EVERY aspect of my life. Love you. but no.
 
Last edited:

PereDroid

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Messages
5,908
Reaction score
3,681
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Current Phone Model
Moto Turbo 2
/edit/ And if someone steals my wallet, at least I have my phone to call my bank and cancel my cards.
If someone steals my phone/wallet what do I do??? :D
 

delcopa

Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Messages
202
Reaction score
7
I have no plan on using it because if you happen to lose your phone, the battery dies or it breaks, you are out of luck. You may have the actual plastic cards at home somewhere, but if they are at home and your phone gets stolen at a bar, you're out of luck. I'm not talking about the thief spending your money, but you no longer have a means to pay for anything. There are times where my phone will randomly eat through its battery in a few hours when normally I can have it on for 15 hours of use and have 30% when I go to bed. Also, very few places take the NFC payment methods. Also, what is the big deal with using NFC anyways? I forget the credit card company that put an NFC chip in their cards so you could tap and not swipe it and it never caught on. Now I have to get my phone out, unlock it, open the app, hope your data connection is good and then tap your phone. Or I could get my wallet out and swipe my card.

I just don't see it as an easier or more efficient method of payment. I see it as a novelty, a conversation starter for your inner nerd. I get this is just my opinion, but checks came out because cash was inconvenient. Imagine carrying $5000 to BestBuy to buy something. A check was easier. Now, credit cards/debit cards came out because personal checks took forever in lines. I think using your phone is a step backwards in efficiency. I'd rather have a single card that has a flexible display on it (hurry up Samsung) where you could touch which account you want to use and either tap it via NFC or swipe it. No having to log in, nothing. Use a finger print reader so it knows its you before the purchase and use wireless charging tech at home to charge it. But even that would have draw backs.

Or what happens if you lose your wallet then your out of luck and have no way to pay for anything or if someone steals your wallet......Wallets still tend to disappear more then phones cause they hold CASH and CREDIT CARDS! Now if you have BOTH you can actually still pay if the place supports the digital wallet. THe wallet is still secure if lost or stolen cause requires a PIN to purchase and also if you secure your phone then would be two PINS one to get into the phone and the other to use the wallet. Hard Plastic CC's think about the last time someone actually checked your ID to use it to pay for something......
 
Top