Steve Jobs Contacted Samsung in July, 2010 About Patent Infringement

Discussion in 'Android News' started by dgstorm, Sep 30, 2011.

  1. dgstorm

    dgstorm Editor in Chief
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    11,019
    Likes Received:
    3,983
    Trophy Points:
    823
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +4,258
    [​IMG]

    According to reports, Apple's Steve Jobs personally contacted Samsung in July of 2010, in order to negotiate terms when Apple first suspected Samsung's Galaxy S devices were violating Apple patents. Here's a quote from the PhoneArena article with a few details,
    Further industry intel indicates that Mr. Jobs was not directly involved in these negotiations, but was simply the "bearer of the olive-branch" to get negotiations started. Shortly after negotiations began, Samsung didn't agree with Apple's assessment of the situation, and felt that Apple was simply using their working relationship to pressure Samsung into compliance. This eventually led to the patent war that is going on now.

    Source: Android.net via PhoneArena
     
  2. JohnnytheK

    JohnnytheK Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    1,448
    Likes Received:
    54
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +61
    So Samsung's ultimately to blame? Pride and arrogance? Kinda sad if true.

    Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk
     
  3. johnomaz

    johnomaz Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2010
    Messages:
    3,070
    Likes Received:
    565
    Trophy Points:
    178
    Location:
    Central Valley, California
    Ratings:
    +682
    Current Phone Model:
    LG G4
    Wonder who Jobs contacted. Probably some entry level tech support person in India who had no idea who he was or what he was talking about. But hey, he called and I'm sure Apple's legal team will run miles with it.
     
  4. OneTenderRebel

    OneTenderRebel Silver Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2010
    Messages:
    3,327
    Likes Received:
    63
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Hampton Falls, NH
    Ratings:
    +64
    yeah I'm sure that's it.................:icon_eek:
     
  5. UNC

    UNC Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Fayettenam,NC
    Ratings:
    +2
    I wonder how the FANatics will spin this one?

    Isn't it funny that the money that Apple pays Samsung for all the components they use was then used to advertise products that directly ripped off Apple?? Shouldn't Samsung have spent that money on their own R&D instead of blowing it* and then just sending one guy to the iPhone announcement with a pen-camera and a tape recorder????
    In this twisted World Steve Jobs could get robbed at gunpoint by Eric Schmidt and people would say it's Jobs' fault!!!!


    LOL!!!
     
    #5 UNC, Sep 30, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 30, 2011
  6. czerdrill

    czerdrill Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    4,825
    Likes Received:
    12
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Ratings:
    +12
    Or he actually called a higher up at Samsung and genuinely wanted to discuss licensing. But yeah, your scenario is probably just as likely... View attachment 40919
     
  7. kodiak799

    kodiak799 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,851
    Likes Received:
    701
    Trophy Points:
    258
    Ratings:
    +859
    Ripped-off? Pretty harsh for a few similar looking icons. I somehow doubt people buy phones based on what a few icons look like.

    I'm sure when Steve Jobs calls it's usually good news and something to look forward to. "Oh, I wonder what that prankster wants now...He's such a card!"

    It's no olive branch when you call to negotiate a settlement over very questionable patent infringement to begin with. Kind of smells of "I've got a weak case, but let me see if I can extort you, anyway". And I don't fault the business practice, I just fail to see how this gives Steve Jobs the high ground or makes him out to be some sort of peacemaker. Nothing to read into about an offer to potentially discuss licensing without knowing if the terms were reasonable (obviously not, given this ended up in the courts, but that doesn't mean Apple was unreasonable any more than they weren't).
     
    #7 kodiak799, Sep 30, 2011
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2011
  8. pc747

    pc747 Administrator
    Staff Member Rescue Squad

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2009
    Messages:
    22,916
    Likes Received:
    4,318
    Trophy Points:
    1,123
    Ratings:
    +4,843
    I dont know, there are people who bought the samsung galaxy phone just cause it looked like the iphone. And in China where a lot of things are copied to make knockoffs I can see Apple's point. As far as I am concerned its the jobs of the lawyers to handle litigation. Being I do not have a taped phone conversation for me to hear I can not say whether it was an olive branch or an extortion. I say we leave it for the courts to decide.
     
  9. UNC

    UNC Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,358
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Location:
    Fayettenam,NC
    Ratings:
    +2
    That is not harsh, it is true. In no way does Touchwiz look like ANY other OEM skin of Android!! It is a total "Hong Kong" special.

    I have told this story many times and I will continue to do so, I told my best friend last Christmas that Verizon was about to get the iPhone, and he replied "Verizon already has iPhone" then he claimed he saw it at work. I was like, "nah that's a Samsung" and he SWORE up and down it was an iPhone... Then a few days later he says "oh yeah, it was a Samsung". My friend had an HTC Magic, and a Droid 1 before this took place, so he knows what Android looks like (probably more so than some people here). This is a fact, and the FACT that an android user couldn't tell the Samsung apart from the iPhone shows you that they are using the benefits of someone else's design (iOS) in order to get more sales.

    If one person goes to VZW or AT&T and says "I want the iPhone, but the Galaxy S is so much cheaper and it's the same anyway" and chooses the Galaxy S than Apple is right and should be compensated.

    This is for the cheap seats; The fact that Touchwiz looks NOTHING like any other OEM skin of Android, and is almost indistinguishable from Apple tells you what you need to know. (unless you don't want to know)


    /rant
     
  10. ilikemoneygreen

    ilikemoneygreen Silver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    2,580
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Location:
    AZ, Superstition MTNs!
    Ratings:
    +18
    Im going with my common sense here, id say that a phone call from Steve Jobs is mandatory in that situation.. Billion dollar relationships dont end on the whim of a lower level employee. If theirs a problem that would effect this billion dollar relationship, I bet both the CEOs at least had a conversation about it if not multiple trying to sort out the situation. I don't think Apple even gave Samsung a potential out in this conversation though ( at least not a sensible one). "Hey, all your products look like mine, stop selling them or i will sue you" "Yea....um... no, thats going to ruin our mobile division." "Well i called you personally just to tell you your an important supplier with whom we have a deep relationship. We wanted to give you a chance to do the right thing but that doesn't look like it will happen." maybe even a "i really wish you would comply with our demand and just stop selling your Android devices and to focus on producing parts for the iDevices. Android sucks anyway." (haha maybe not that last part but i bet i got the gist of the conversation.) I kinda dont see this as news though, as this already happened in my mind when Apple sued Samsung (As companies in partnership don't just throw lawyers at each other, they normally try to just work with eachother since its mutually beneficial to both parties.).
     
    #10 ilikemoneygreen, Sep 30, 2011
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2011
  11. tjk629

    tjk629 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2010
    Messages:
    3,040
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +65
    Current Phone Model:
    NEXUS 6
    I wouldn't be surprised. Not to sound racist but Asian companies are super protective of their high end products.

    Kind of reminds me back when the game Dead or Alive first came out. Namco (Tekken) called it a Virtua Fighter rip off. Itagaki took it personally and would trash talk Tekken whenever he could.

    Sent from my Droid using DroidForums
     
  12. pc747

    pc747 Administrator
    Staff Member Rescue Squad

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2009
    Messages:
    22,916
    Likes Received:
    4,318
    Trophy Points:
    1,123
    Ratings:
    +4,843


    View attachment 40920


    I must admit when I saw the SGS out of china for the first time I thought some one was pulling a copy job. I basically thought some guy over seas did a good job copying iphone and slapping android over it. If it was just one item I would have to say coincidence. But then samsung has a "samsung galaxy "player" to compete with the ipod touch ..I have to say someone is trying to pull a job, they are making items to look as much like the i-products as possible with out getting sued.