Sprint and T-Mobile Merger Might be DOA Before Getting Off the Ground

Discussion in 'Android News' started by dgstorm, Jan 29, 2014.

  1. dgstorm

    dgstorm Editor in Chief Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    8,917
    Likes Received:
    2,545
    Trophy Points:
    378
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +2,668
    [​IMG]

    The Wall Street Journal recently reported that The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is not too keen on a merger between Sprint and T-Mobile. According to an unnamed source, a meeting took place between SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son, Sprint CEO Dan Hesse, and DOJ regulators. In that meeting, the WSJ's sources indicated the DOJ said,

    If this meeting really did take place and this is the perspective of the DOJ, it shouldn't come as much of a surprise. During the court hearings in which the DOJ and other regulatory agencies where investigating the AT&T and T-Mobile merger a couple of years ago, they made it clear they prefer to have 4 Big carriers competing in the U.S. carrier industry. Over-all, the T-Mobile and Sprint merger might never make it to the finish line. The WSJ went on to say that this might not dissuade SoftBank's CEO Masayoshi Son from trying. The question is, what would he be able to do to make this merger possible.

    Source: WSJ
     
  2. kodiak799

    kodiak799 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,325
    Likes Received:
    442
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Ratings:
    +507
    That 4 is superior to 3 players of equal size seems a bit of an arbitrary distinction. And I'm not anti-trust expert, but I thought it used to be anything less than 80% market share was kosher, and more recently they've taken a more aggressive view of media/access looking at like 60%.

    I wonder if Android is entrenched enough now for Google to look at acquiring TMo. You've already got Google Voice and Google Fiber - they aren't going to stay out of the distribution business forever.
     
  3. johnomaz

    johnomaz Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,762
    Likes Received:
    420
    Trophy Points:
    148
    Location:
    Central Valley, California
    Ratings:
    +470
    Current Phone Model:
    Nexus 6
    except tmobile and sprint aren't really 'big' compared to att and verizon. So they want to keep two giants and two above average tall companies. Maybe they own stock in att or verizon and want the value to stay nice and high.
     
  4. kodiak799

    kodiak799 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    5,325
    Likes Received:
    442
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Ratings:
    +507
    That's the point. They have difficulty competing with AT&T and VZW, but a combined company would be about the size of AT&T and VZW, so you'd have 3 pretty equal competitors. I'm not really seeing why that would somehow be worse for competition. VZW and AT&T pretty much lead the market - Sprint and TMo try to trade profit for marketshare but, for the most part, don't impact the other two hardly at all.

    I just don't buy the reasoning. Sprint and TMo really aren't that competitive, but a combined company probably could be.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. dgstorm

    dgstorm Editor in Chief Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    8,917
    Likes Received:
    2,545
    Trophy Points:
    378
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +2,668
    I concur with this. Perhaps Mr. Son will be able to convince the DOJ of your same argument...
     
  6. cybertec69

    cybertec69 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,046
    Likes Received:
    212
    Trophy Points:
    128
    Location:
    Staten Island, NY
    Ratings:
    +240
    If the merger does happen, I say good buy to those unlimited data plans. The more carriers the better it is for the consumer, competition is a good thing.
     
Search tags for this page

sprint t-mobile combined will they be close in marketshare t