Should I flash Ese53 .sbf first?

Discussion in 'Android Hacks and Help' started by Balthazar, Mar 7, 2010.

  1. Balthazar

    Balthazar Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Salina, KS
    Ratings:
    +0
    Or more accurately, should I have flashed the Ese53 .sbf before I flashed Pete's Bugless v5? I haven't had any problems so far, temps seem normal, I was getting occasional FCs at first, but that went away after a reboot. My concern is if we are going to continue with 2.1 ROMs and let the 2.01 ROMs fall by the wayside, would it be better to start with the new base or is it OK to keep things the way I have them now?
     
  2. thatguychuck

    thatguychuck Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2009
    Messages:
    433
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    SD
    Ratings:
    +0
    I could be wrong here, but I seem to remember reading if you flash that file, you will no longer have root. No root, no recovery, just the stock setup. I'd stick to the ROMs,
     
  3. titans

    titans Premium Member Rescue Squad Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2009
    Messages:
    2,662
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    101
    Ratings:
    +0
    I believe he's correct, the sbf file is what Verizon Tech uses to unbrick a phone
     
  4. Balthazar

    Balthazar Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Salina, KS
    Ratings:
    +0
    I found a link on Alldroid of a guy who posted his nandroid backup of ESE53 plus root and busybox. I am tempted to use it, but my understanding of what exactly nandroid backs up is limited at best. Would it back up the files affected by flashing ESE53, or just the system, data and boot files from the ROM? I was just wondering if anyone out there has tried this?
     
  5. LtKen

    LtKen Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Messages:
    2,628
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Ratings:
    +2
    As a rule, you shouldnt have to touch the SBF but in the very extreme cases. Most 'bricks' can be undone using SPRecovery.

    The SBF is great, but you run the risk of totaling your phone. It's the last resort.
     
  6. adrynalyne

    adrynalyne Premium Member Premium Member Developer

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,896
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Ratings:
    +4
    The sbf is also the only way to install a Radio or bootloader update as well.

    Note: There are rumors that ese53 increases call quality. Don't shoot the messenger, just passing on what I heard.

    As for the posts about losing root, thats only half true. Root is still alive and well, via adb. At least, it is on the 2.1 SBFs.
     
  7. nerdbox08

    nerdbox08 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +0

    Curious: Are the ESE53 and the ERE25 .sbf files all OCed?
     
  8. adrynalyne

    adrynalyne Premium Member Premium Member Developer

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,896
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Ratings:
    +4
    There is a member setting them up that way, but generally speaking, no, they are bone stock.
     
  9. nerdbox08

    nerdbox08 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +0

    I'm hoping I have the .sbf files that are bone stock, as you say. I wouldn't want to accidentally have a 'return to stock actually OCed file', lol.
     
  10. adrynalyne

    adrynalyne Premium Member Premium Member Developer

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2009
    Messages:
    2,896
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Ratings:
    +4
    Yeah I could see where that might be an issue ;)
     
  11. Balthazar

    Balthazar Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Salina, KS
    Ratings:
    +0
    So am I correct in assuming nerdbox and adrynalyne have done this? Any pros/cons?
     
  12. tktouch12

    tktouch12 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    1,240
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Ratings:
    +0
    i used the sbf to flash ese53, the oc'ed version. its really fast, and i dont even know if i want to install bugless or just stay with overclocked stock 2.1. i think the battery increased too.
    i know sbf is kind of dangerous, but is it that big of a concern? maybe i wont do it in the future, but my droid is SO quick i love it
     
  13. nerdbox08

    nerdbox08 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +0

    I did flash the 2.0.1 (ESD56) when it first came out. I have a limited, working knowledge of the RSDLite program. Actually, I only know how to apply the sbf files with it.

    I've not attempted to flash the other versions, because I am using a rom built off them.

    While you could do this, there is no reason to do so since you aren't having any issues to start with using BB.

    The SBF files are a last ditch effort to save your phone. You can actually, ultimately break the phone if something goes wrong during the install. If you don't NEED to use the sbf installation, I would stay away from it.
     
  14. Balthazar

    Balthazar Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Salina, KS
    Ratings:
    +0
    Thanks nerdbox, that's what I wanted to know. One other question, if the ROM is built off the ESE53 .sbf files, wouldn't that mean the other perks (better radio, bootloader) would already be built into the ROM? If so flashing the .sbf files would be redundant. If not than there may be some advantage. Am I correct that the ROM would already have it built in?

    BTW, Bugless v0.6 is amazing if anyone is thinking of trying it out.
     
  15. nerdbox08

    nerdbox08 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2010
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +0

    Honestly, this is exactly how I see it. But again, I don't have the complete knowledge of this as some other people do. But since the ROMs we are using are built off these files, it would only make sense that they are getting the perks.

    25 fixed the anti-aliasing in the touch brower and gave us native pinch zoom, so I would assume we get the other stuff too.

    I'm on a 53 ROM and I'm pretty sure my call quality is better, I think my reception is better too.