Samsung's Response to Limited Storage on Galaxy S4 is a Reminder of the microSD Slot

dgstorm

Editor in Chief
Staff member
Premium Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
10,991
Reaction score
3,961
Location
Austin, TX
Samsung-Galaxy-S4-white-and-black-double-overlapping-angle-shot.jpg

Samsung recently responded to some of the complaints on the web regarding the low amount of storage available on the 16GB Galaxy S4. In case you missed the story previously, the 16GB SGS4 only comes with about 9GB of useable space due to all the software and the OS taking up 46% of the storage. Here is Samsung's response on the issue,

“For the Galaxy S4 16 GB model, approximately 6.85 GB occupies the system part of internal memory, which is 1 GB bigger than that of the Galaxy S3, in order to provide a high resolution display and more powerful features to our consumers. To offer the ultimate mobile experience to our users, Samsung provides a microSD slot on Galaxy S4 for extension of memory.”

Well... that was worded in a very polite way, but is still pretty cheeky of them. Ultimately, their point is perfectly valid and is probably not that big of a deal. Alternatively, one could just purchase the 32GB version of the device instead. What do you guys think? Is this something Samsung should deal with, or is it just the price we pay for all the whiz-bang features they included in the new device?
 

drgrendel

New Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2013
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
IMO, Samsung delivered a great response to the "issue." Unfortunately, consumers susbscribe to the "it is much easier to say what is wrong with something before saying what is right about it."
 

mykl376

Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
129
Reaction score
7
I don't see the issue as long as there's a microSD slot. They had to make a cheaper version so more people would buy it, and memory is the easiest thing to take away, yet still keep the devices the "same."
 

joemontana

Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2011
Messages
75
Reaction score
3
Location
Kalispell, MT
Not a big deal at all as far as I'm concerned. How much is a micro SD card? They *do* put the slot in the phone for a reason...LOL
 

johnomaz

Silver Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
3,187
Reaction score
633
Location
Central Valley, California
Current Phone Model
Google Pixel 2XL
The only issue I see is that the SD card is for storage. What about the growing size of apps. Not every app can be put on the SD card.
 

comk4ver

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
627
Reaction score
14
I would say manufacturers need to start advertising true available space instead of total space. An sd card as stated previously should be for storage items read pictures, music, and backup files.
 

Dissonance

Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2010
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
What concerns me, as John alluded to, is the number of apps that cannot be installed on the SD card. Basically, any app that might have a widget you would like use. It isn't a dealbreaker for me, but it's something to think about. I'll still probably get the 32gb version. On the other hand, where else are they going to put their software?

If widgets could run from apps installed on the SD card, I probably wouldn't even care about the internal memory size (much), I'd just get a hugh SD card and call it good.
 

LoneWolfArcher

Silver Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2009
Messages
1,808
Reaction score
481
Applause for Samsung including the sd-card slot. Essentially makes the on board memory size moot. Apps do not take up much space, the majority of space is consumed by media. A certain fruit company might not get it but Samsung does. (And don't even mention the cloud. Data service is still not available every where.)
 

52brandon

Active Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2010
Messages
1,019
Reaction score
20
Are you just deliberately being obtuse? Or are you being serious?
I seriously don't see the issue. So there's a smaller amount of space? The SD card slot fixes that. I also didn't think the statement had any sort of attitude
 

huskur

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
1,866
Reaction score
36
Location
Lower Delaware
The issue is that only certain things can be stored on the Micro SD card. Also, retrieval of data is significantly faster from onboard phone storage. That is why I opted for the 32 GB of the S3 when it came out. It's better to have extra storage than not enough. I have since given that phone to my my wife and got the Note 2 which is only offered in 16GB. Nice phone but I have two thirds of my phone storage used up and it is less than 6 months old and my SD card is 70% full. Ever wonder why iPhone offers 16, 32, and 64 varieties? Yes, its because of the "different strokes for different folks". (I know....there isn't an option for more storage due to no micro sd)
 

huskur

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
1,866
Reaction score
36
Location
Lower Delaware
In a "perfect" phone. I would opt for a 64GB version with a 64GB Micro SD expansion option.
 

comk4ver

Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2010
Messages
627
Reaction score
14
Is there even going to be a bigger version of the s4? I haven't heard anything regarding that.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
 
Top