Microsoft Files Antitrust Lawsuit vs. Motorola; Related News: Pot Calls Kettle Black

Discussion in 'Android News' started by dgstorm, Feb 22, 2012.

  1. dgstorm
    Online

    dgstorm Editor in Chief Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    7,405
    Likes Received:
    1,438
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    [​IMG]

    Here's a potential case of pure hypocrisy. Microsoft is now backing up Apple's stance, and is taking things a step further by filing an anti-trust lawsuit against Motorola Mobility in the EU. MS and Apple claim that Moto is "abusing its standard-essential patents, impeding fair access to patents that are fundamental to regular device function -- this time dealing with video streaming and wireless connectivity." Microsoft further elaborated that they have a problem with Motorola's current patent pricing scheme. Microsoft claims that Motorola is setting an impossibly high royalty of $22.50 for a $1,000 laptop, which only covers fees for H.264 licensing. Here's a quote from the Engadget article with some more details,

    This is all coming from the company, mind you, that has been charging just about every Android OEM on the planet for its own patent licensing issues. However, just for the sake of fairness and clarity, we should definitely mention the flip side to this argument. While Microsoft's actions do smack of hypocrisy, it isn't to the degree that one might initially think. In fact, MS might actually have a legitimate complaint this time. Apparently, the patents for which Motorola is asking high royalties for are "fair-use standard-essential patents". These are fairly common patents, that are not anything very innovative, and typically other companies would be asking a much smaller amount for.

    It definitely appears as though Motorola is using these patents to be "spiteful" against Microsoft for all of the patent licensing fees that have been extorted from them and other Android manufacturers in the past. Technically, it really is a possibility that these patents are being abused under the FRAND standard. FRAND stands for "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms" licensing, and it was established to stop patent holders from unfairly abusing their patents to hinder market competition. (Hmmm... that sounds like Apple doesn't it?) At any rate, it is entirely possible that Motorola doesn't really plan on getting these exorbitant licensing fees from Microsoft, but is really just using their situation as leverage to force MS into working out some different deals of their own. Of course, this could back-fire on them, and several different folks in the industry are unhappy with Motorola, and by extension Google... Motorola for taking this aggressive stance, and Google for not getting them to back down during the buyout process.

    Regardless, even if it turns out that Motorola is being unfair in this new patent warfare battle, it still seems like the "pot calling the kettle black".

    Source: Engadget
  2. johnomaz
    Offline

    johnomaz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,507
    Likes Received:
    286
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Central Valley, California
    Patents can be so damn annoying. Some are needed to actually protect legitimate things while others aren't. I however don't see 2.25% of the product price as being that big. I read not too long ago that Microsoft recieves about $5 for every Android device sold. Guess what, $5 is 2.5% of the sale price of a $200 smart phone and 1.6% of a $300 smart phone.
  3. MissionImprobable
    Offline

    MissionImprobable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,906
    Likes Received:
    76
    Trophy Points:
    48
    word@ my man above. Seems like only a taste of their own medicine. It would take some pretty interesting arguments to get me to feel sorry for Microsoft in the least.
  4. alboboy10
    Offline

    alboboy10 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2010
    Messages:
    1,808
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I like how Google is ironically suing these companies for the same crap that they've sued Google. I'm tired of Ms and apple. Apple is suing for retarded things like tablets being rectangular. But Google can't sue for actual communication technology?

    I really hope Google tears these companies apart.

    I can't wait until chromium comes out. I'm done with Microsoft too. Garbage company.
  5. jroc
    Offline

    jroc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    3,843
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Washington DC
    So let me get this straight...Apple can basically sue for this...and Moto cant? Apple has been suing for basic function AND design...

    Title of this thread should be Pots call Kettle Black.
  6. DaWolf85
    Offline

    DaWolf85 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2010
    Messages:
    308
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ah, see, the key difference here is that Apple is abusing the legal system, whereas Moto is abusing the fact that they can make people pay them money for their patent.
    Apparently one is legal and the other is not.
Search tags for this page

microsoft vs android patent suit