I don't want built-from-source

Discussion in 'Bugless' started by deputc26, Aug 27, 2010.

  1. deputc26

    deputc26 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    720
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +1
    Back in the day when Pete innocuously posted a ROM he'd built for himself and called "Bugless Beauty" as more of a description than the brand that it has become, there was a rush to try it out purely because it was "bugless" and that's what the amateur android hackers such as myself and many others wanted. I've tried lots of ROMs from source and they all seem to have weird issues that not built from source ROMs don't have. I think the way bugless has always had fewer features but better and more stable features says a lot about what people want. I don't want a built from sopurce ROM. I want a bugless beauty.

    Yay for BB :icon_ banana:
     
  2. subyfan

    subyfan Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2010
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +0
    My feelings exactly...:rockon:
     
  3. C3-PO

    C3-PO Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    156
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Newport News, VA
    Ratings:
    +0
    word .....
     
  4. Invader DJ

    Invader DJ Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +0
    I don't know, I love me some Sapphire, it is right up there with Bugless Beast in terms of general stability.
     
  5. skatingrocker17

    skatingrocker17 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2010
    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +0
    Too bad there's no more Bugless Beauty, hopefully there's still more Bugless Beast to come. It seems like .4 became outdated so quick, hard to believe it's almost been 2 months. I'm hoping Pete isn't becoming another Adamz but I don't think he is because he still posts about .5 on twitter. v.4 is still great but I like to try the newest things so I switched from it after having it for about 2 weeks.
     
  6. bendystrawboy

    bendystrawboy Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2010
    Messages:
    797
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +2
    ultimate droid solved all the issues i was having with bb..i think its from source?
     
  7. triplecrown

    triplecrown Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2010
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Jackson, NJ
    Ratings:
    +0
    Yea its "from source" alright.
     
  8. *22899

    *22899 Premium Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2010
    Messages:
    519
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings:
    +5
    SD7 check it out.
     
  9. jbrock98

    jbrock98 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    615
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +0
    yes UD is built from source, and the only rom thats even stood up to challenge ultimate droid has been sapphire or chevy's(on my phone anyhow) but then when u add in all the features with UD it blows competition outta the water, i flash pretty much everything and i've gotten to where i've settled with chevy & UD as my top 2 roms (which means i'll run them more than a day) but my theory is if Ultimate Droid runs great on ur phone then its really hard to choose anything over it b/c its blazing fast w/ all of those features, but my addiction to flashing everything under the sun needs a lil BB to curb the cravings lol Pete puts out a good rom and i'll flash anything once...2,3,4 times if i like dancedroid
     
  10. alitke

    alitke Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +0
    many will not run UD simply b/c of what he said before being removed from this site.
     
  11. kodiak799

    kodiak799 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    4,966
    Likes Received:
    284
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Ratings:
    +296
    Agree. I imagine in developer circles not building from source is frowned upon, like needing training wheels to ride a bike. But if it isn't practically flawless it's worthless.

    I really only care about the increased speed and battery life. A lot of the bells and whistles just seem worthless to me, and I now spend as much time deleting garbage (I use Sweeterhome, so every rom I flash I delete ADW or LauncherPro), live wallpapers, titanium, etc...

    ALL I want is for a rom that lets me overclock, is good on battery life, and doesn't give me re-draws! A lot of the other stuff I can do myself, if I choose, like loading a theme or I can install wireless tether myself. But I need system ram for my ginormous Sweeterhome theme and I don't care for bloated roms!!!!
     
  12. deputc26

    deputc26 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2009
    Messages:
    720
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +1
    This pretty much sums it up. The first few months after I first started learning adb and playing with the SDK I was in a hospital bed and had lots of time to try stuff out, but now I'm back to work and don't have time to optimize stuff myself so really I'm looking for "practically flawless" ...and good bat life.
     
  13. gloster

    gloster Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2009
    Messages:
    94
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +0
    I also have mixed feelings about running UD. But I also ran just about every other ROM and ended up sticking with UD for now. Nothing else was as fast in day to day use and there are no bugs I run into.
     
  14. alitke

    alitke Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2010
    Messages:
    193
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +0
    I am actually not a fan of UD at all but I decided to throw his ROM on my phone to try it and actually have been using it for about 2 weeks now and loving it. Hard to say considering everything that he did but man I really enjoy it none the less.

    not building from source really does not matter. He is dev'ing and that is what matters. with how many users he has I would say if its frowned upon someone is being a jerk as his roms generally have better battery life than anyone else and are usually pretty great.
     
  15. jasonppp

    jasonppp Premium Member Premium Member Developer

    Joined:
    May 27, 2010
    Messages:
    959
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +1
    R.I.P Bugless beauty lets just hope the BEAST gets a longer lifespan.

    Bugless Beast .4 really the name says more then i can promote. 2 months old and still runs smooth, quick and responsive also got me a quadrant of 1723 only real flaw besides bein outdated is the ota update but pete did supply a patch which i refer to as a bandaid

    Although chevys SS4.7 built from source rom is very nice love the whole notification settings. only one drawback i dont like having to manually restore my apps

    liquid frozen yogart 1.5 is a slick rom also although being built from source and seeing a cpl other roms built from source i am slightly dissapointed i feel there should be more atleast a simplified app for script management

    lithiummod 1.0.12 what can we say as far as customization jrummy is the king many options for various different appeals

    sapphire 1.0 another slick rom very smooth and quick