Google Glass and moving violations: There will be growing pains

Discussion in 'Android News' started by Preach2k, Oct 30, 2013.

  1. Preach2k
    Offline

    Preach2k DF News Team Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    1,922
    Likes Received:
    317
    Trophy Points:
    148
    Location:
    Hometown Brooklyn, NY Now Fuquay Varina, NC
    Ratings:
    +328
    Current Phone Model:
    Galaxy Note 4
    Twitter:
    DroidNCState
    [​IMG]
    Making the rounds overnight on Google+ post from Cecilia Abadie, who received a ticket for wearing Google Glass while driving. She puts it this way:

    Is this the real reason Abadie was stopped, it appears — unless Google Glass caused her to break the speed limit. And folks are trying to argue that Glass falls under the exemptions for that particular California law anyway.

    I think we should get used to seeing more stories like this. The more Google Glass drops in price the more purchases there will be. As with any new technology, there will be growing pains.

    Is #GoogleGlass ilegal while driving or is this cop wrong???
    Any legal advice is appreciated!! This happened in California. Do you know any other #GlassExplorers that got a similar ticket anywhere in the US?



    Source
     
  2. wardo
    Offline

    wardo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2010
    Messages:
    334
    Likes Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +9
    I.would give someone a ticket in a heartbeat for driving with those things. Obstruction to vision is obviously true.
     
  3. johnomaz
    Offline

    johnomaz Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,574
    Likes Received:
    323
    Trophy Points:
    148
    Location:
    Central Valley, California
    Ratings:
    +328
    To be honest, I'm shocked the cop knew what Google Glass was. Also, why can you get a ticket for GG but not a GPS unit on your windshield? You could argue that its a hands free device. The officer had no idea if the screen was even turned on in the first place. It would have the same disruption in vision as sunglasses that have a printed logo on the lens (or rhinestones in the corner) or if you really want to argue it, the same as your rear view window which blocks a portion of your forward vision completely. You could argue that the new Cadillac's new vehicles equipped with their HUD technology is just as distracting as GG. I'd fight it in court. If you can, get some pictures of cops using their phones while in their police cars. I see it all the time. One more example before I submit this is the new motorcycle helmet from Skully. It has a HUD in it as well too.
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2013
  4. dgstorm
    Offline

    dgstorm Editor in Chief Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    7,780
    Likes Received:
    1,715
    Trophy Points:
    258
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +1,746
    Interesting story. Thanks for sharing this. I think she has a shot at fighting this. It probably depends on the judge she gets.
     
  5. KZIWarrior
    Offline

    KZIWarrior Silver Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,609
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    103
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    Ratings:
    +2
    ^+1
    johnomaz is right on point. Corvettes have had HUD displays for the whole C6 line and Cadillac introduced a HUD (the night-vision system) back in 2000/2001 so unless they are going to start issuing citations for all of these Glass should be safe. Though this is California so any common-sense or logic-based reasoning is excluded....
     
  6. xeene
    Offline

    xeene Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,039
    Likes Received:
    400
    Trophy Points:
    148
    Location:
    usa
    Ratings:
    +416
    its california the most freedomless state in the country. cop would lose in 49 other states.
     
  7. SpeJ3435
    Offline

    SpeJ3435 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    Messages:
    137
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Richmond, VA
    Ratings:
    +18
    The only difference between Google Glass and a heads up display or a GPS is that Google Glass is both. If you really wanted to get technical, it isn't really a screen, but a lens. It is a hands free device, but to xeene, you are perfectly correct. California sucks when it comes to freedom.
     
  8. SquireSCA
    Offline

    SquireSCA Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Ratings:
    +94
    Good point... or the REEVU helmet... has a mirror array built into the skull to allow the rider to have a rear-view mirror inside the helmet... I was thinking it would be awesome to always see behind you, especially on the race track where they make me remove my mirrors and stuff... Not sure how the law would see that though for public roads...
     
  9. xsylus
    Offline

    xsylus Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    879
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Tucson, AZ, USA, Earth
    Ratings:
    +32
    It's amazing how many gadgets we ARE allowed to use in our cars. Most of the new tech in the dashboards of cars wouldn't even be allowed by the FAA due to possible pilot distraction... wait... what? :blink: So those gadgets that ARE allowed in cars are too distracting for airline pilots but they're not to drivers? As far as I'm concerned anything that takes even a fraction of a driver's attention away from driving is endangering the safety of other drivers.
     
  10. SquireSCA
    Offline

    SquireSCA Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Ratings:
    +94
    Good point. Or how about a person smoking and talking on the phone, leaving no hand free to use a damned turn signal? Or someone eating a burger while they drive? Same thing...

    Cars are supposed to be for safe, comfortable transportation, or sports cars for that kind of driving. Not mobile restaurants and entertainment centers...
     
  11. Hugh Jass
    Offline

    Hugh Jass Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2010
    Messages:
    1,607
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +88
    Pretty much sums up my opinion, all running electronics should be off to drivers. People are dumb and make enough bad choices without the help of tech. removing their focus entirely.

    Makes me want to go to an oldschool vehicle and install of EMP bomber in my truck that goes off every 30 seconds with a 60ft field of operation.
     
  12. TJF2011
    Offline

    TJF2011 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    98
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Ratings:
    +1

    Ya I mean technically that is the law. But I dont know a cop would actually write that. I would fight it in court.

    as for taking pictures of cops using cell phones? Says right in the cell phone law that they are exempt as long as the calls are work related.. good luck trying to prove that.

    my OPINION... the lady probably pissed the cop off or he gave her a warning for speed and the ticket on the GG so it wouldn't go on her insurance.
     
  13. obxsalvo
    Offline

    obxsalvo Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2010
    Messages:
    244
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Hatteras Is. NC
    Ratings:
    +40
    Current Phone Model:
    Droid Turbo
    Why do some ( most if not all ) still have signs saying " all vehicles must stop for school bus's when red lights are flashing" because of the 10% of drivers that are ..... what is that word?
     
  14. Narsil
    Offline

    Narsil Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    146
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Ratings:
    +152
    Clearly, you guys who think driver distractions should be banned have never driven with children in the car.

    I could sit backwards in my seat, reach around behind me to steer, and look through a mirror to see where I was going and be less distracted than driving with children...while eating a cheeseburger and talking on my cell phone. Ban children in cars. It's for their own safety.
     
  15. SquireSCA
    Offline

    SquireSCA Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Messages:
    1,277
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Ratings:
    +94
    When we were kids, my parents told us to be quiet. If we didn't, we only got one warning before my father would use his mythical dad-strength to power his pimp hand and discipline us.

    Car rides were typically quiet and uneventful as a result.
     
Search tags for this page

violation 841 california