Fire Phone Off-Contract Pricing seems high!

danDroid

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 20, 2009
Messages
2,785
Reaction score
440
I'm a little disappointed with the off-contract pricing for the Amazon Fire Phone.

Amazon Fire Phone 32Gb - $649.00
Amazon Fire Phone 64Gb - $749.00


ouch!
 

wicked

Administrator
Staff member
Premium Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2010
Messages
5,279
Reaction score
1,517
Location
San Jose, CA
Current Phone Model
Pixel 3 XL
Twitter
@MikeAlvez
Yeah, that's a little steep.
 

cr6

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
8,281
Reaction score
5,802
Location
NW Rocky Mtn region
Website
www.dronewolfmedia.com
Current Phone Model
Galaxy S7 Edge
Twitter
@dronewolfmedia
2400mah battery seems a bit weak for this device. Those cameras and sensors have got to eat up the battery life on this puppy.
I liken this 3D feature to live wallpaper. Sure it looks cool, but it's probably not practical to keep it turned on all the time.
As with every new device, real world reviews will tell the true story here after all the oohs & ahhs have died down. :D
 

Jeffrey

Premium Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
6,645
Reaction score
3,511
Location
Thailand
Current Phone Model
iPhone 7 Plus JB
I'm a little disappointed with the off-contract pricing for the Amazon Fire Phone.

Amazon Fire Phone 32Gb - $649.00
Amazon Fire Phone 64Gb - $749.00


ouch!
They priced it high and partnered with AT&T. My guess is they don't want to sell the phone. They want you on contract.
 

pc747

Regular Member
Rescue Squad
Joined
Dec 23, 2009
Messages
25,489
Reaction score
6,865
Sounds kind of HTC first-ish . I predict by black Friday they be giving this away with a bundle deal with the fire tablet, prime membership, and fire TV all for $199 on contract.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk 2
 

cereal killer

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
11,254
Reaction score
1,269
Location
Austin, TX
Current Phone Model
Nokia Lumia Icon
They just killed all their potential success with these bonehead moves (pricing/AT&T Exclusivity) Should have been priced similar to the Moto X with a roll out across all carriers.
 

equake

Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2009
Messages
105
Reaction score
1
They just killed all their potential success with these bonehead moves (pricing/AT&T Exclusivity) Should have been priced similar to the Moto X with a roll out across all carriers.

It is a Moto X with the same sort of custom s/w for image recognition and voice control.


Gimmicky at best.

My 2 cents

Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
 

Jeffrey

Premium Member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
6,645
Reaction score
3,511
Location
Thailand
Current Phone Model
iPhone 7 Plus JB
They should have sold the phone for $249. and given $100 gift card with each phone.
 

kodiak799

Gold Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2010
Messages
6,146
Reaction score
827
But how many people are buying phones retail?

I still think these retail prices are collusion to force people onto contracts - in exchange for guaranteed volume from the carriers, the OEM's artificially inflate retail prices to funnel people to subsidized contracts.

I'm not convinced carriers are paying $350 subsidy for these phones, and even then that puts us only into the $550 range. I forget which phone it was a few years ago, but a leaked image showed @$400 wholesale (that would be the price BB, VZW and AT&T pay) to Best Buy for a phone retailing for at least $650. And that $400 price jives a lot better with OEM margins.
 

94lt1

Super Moderator
Staff member
Premium Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
17,041
Reaction score
3,997
Location
SE TX
Current Phone Model
Droid Turbo 2
Wow... Just.. Smdh..
 

Caesars

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2012
Messages
1,376
Reaction score
114
Facebook phone 3.0

Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
 

grenefroggie

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
931
Reaction score
390
Location
KY
Current Phone Model
Google Nexus 5
They just killed all their potential success with these bonehead moves (pricing/AT&T Exclusivity) Should have been priced similar to the Moto X with a roll out across all carriers.

Rolling out across all carriers for a company like Amazon that has little real experience in designing, building, marketing and selling a phone is not cost effective. Verizon and Sprint have silly CDMA radios in their phones meaning they have to pass silly tests and subject themselves to Verizon's demand to brand everything. T-Mo probably didn't want to support the thing being that they are too busy with Sprint trying to buy them and pushing the uncarrier movement. AT&T has the resources to help with a phone design and network certification.

Apple was successful doing it with AT&T. Amazon isn't large, but I am sure Amazon diehards will want the phone.

But how many people are buying phones retail?

I still think these retail prices are collusion to force people onto contracts - in exchange for guaranteed volume from the carriers, the OEM's artificially inflate retail prices to funnel people to subsidized contracts.

I'm not convinced carriers are paying $350 subsidy for these phones, and even then that puts us only into the $550 range. I forget which phone it was a few years ago, but a leaked image showed @$400 wholesale (that would be the price BB, VZW and AT&T pay) to Best Buy for a phone retailing for at least $650. And that $400 price jives a lot better with OEM margins.

If the carriers are buying Samsung and Apple phones they are paying a pretty penny because customers want them. As for anyone else, they do what they can to get the carrier's attention.
 

NOVICE

Active Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2012
Messages
246
Reaction score
32
I'm a little disappointed with the off-contract pricing for the Amazon Fire Phone.

Amazon Fire Phone 32Gb - $649.00
Amazon Fire Phone 64Gb - $749.00

ouch!

The off-contract price is not just disappointing it's insane. My Note 3 was 700$ and the Fire doesn't compare. The subsidized price is equally ridiculous.

Look for some drastic discounting.
 
Top