DOJ Delays Apple Hearing at the Last Minute; Claims Possible Third-Party Method to Unlock iPhone

Discussion in 'Android News' started by dgstorm, Mar 22, 2016.

  1. dgstorm

    dgstorm Editor in Chief
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    11,016
    Likes Received:
    3,979
    Trophy Points:
    823
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +4,254
    [​IMG]

    Just like the plot of some intriguing spy-thriller, the FBI vs. Apple court case that was to be heard this morning, was delayed by a last minute request from the Department of Justice. The DOJ postponed the hearing last night, in which they would have gone up against Apple to get the court to force the Cupertino company to unlock the San Bernardino shooter's iPhone.

    According to reports, the reason why the Feds pulled back at the last minute was because they claim to have found a third party "possible method" that will allow them to unlock the device without Apple's help. Lawyers for the DOJ wrote the following,

    "On Sunday, March 20, 2016, an outside party demonstrated to the FBI a possible method for unlocking [terrorist Syed] Farook's iPhone. Testing is required to determine whether it is a viable method that will not compromise data on Farook's iPhone. If the method is viable, it should eliminate the need for the assistance from Apple Inc. ("Apple") set forth in the All Writs Act Order in this case."

    "Accordingly, to provide time for testing the method, the government hereby requests that the hearing set for March 22, 2016 be vacated."

    The government requested that the hearing be postponed for two weeks and convene on April 5th. The DOJ claims they need the extra time to see if the method they have will work on Farook's iPhone 5c without compromising the data.

    Sheri Pym, the judge presiding over the case, agreed to vacate the hearing scheduled for today, and required the DOJ to update the court by April 5th. Pym also suspended the motion requiring Apple to help the FBI unlock the iPhone, until that time.

    Apparently, Apple isn't willing to give up the fight completely, since they feel they are protecting consumer rights. Apple told reporters that they would insist the FBI share the details on the exploit, if the FBI plans to keep moving forward with the case; however, if the FBI drops the case, Apple will have no legal recourse to request that information.

    Several editorial comments across the web are suggesting this last minute delay seems fishy. One theory is that the FBI had this method all along and was simply using this case to grab power by setting a legal precedent. The other theory is that they didn't really find a method to unlock the iPhone, but are simply backing off because they can see the legal winds blowing against them.

    Basically, it seems like Apple pushing harder is simply the company "calling the FBI's bluff." What do you folks think?
     
    #1 dgstorm, Mar 22, 2016
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2016
  2. johnomaz

    johnomaz Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2010
    Messages:
    3,181
    Likes Received:
    633
    Trophy Points:
    178
    Location:
    Central Valley, California
    Ratings:
    +771
    Current Phone Model:
    Google Pixel 2XL
    Hope apple decides to shake up the way they encrypt phones to deal with this if its true. I'm sorry, but I'm not a criminal and I expect the contents of my phone to be secure to just me without some kind of way around it.
     
  3. EyeOWA

    EyeOWA Senior Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2010
    Messages:
    267
    Likes Received:
    105
    Trophy Points:
    58
    Location:
    Iowa
    Ratings:
    +128
    Current Phone Model:
    Note 4
    Makes me think this will be the result...for those old enough to remember.
     

    Attached Files:

    • Like Like x 1
  4. mountainbikermark

    mountainbikermark Super Moderator
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2010
    Messages:
    7,455
    Likes Received:
    3,886
    Trophy Points:
    1,563
    Ratings:
    +4,348
    [​IMG]

    Support Our Troops!!!
    Beast Mode 4
    <><
     
    • Like Like x 2
  5. kodiak799

    kodiak799 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    6,000
    Likes Received:
    774
    Trophy Points:
    258
    Ratings:
    +941
    man, I was pissed....They had to have opened it before it aired, had to have known it was empty but still aired it - wasted an hour and a half watching that!
     
  6. dja1980

    dja1980 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    17
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +20
    So, IF this third-party unlock method turns out to be true... would Apple have looked better by simply unlocking the phone? I've always been on the side of Apple to not unlock the phone, but I've got to believe that this scenario will make them looks worse. This story really got the public to believing that NO ONE can unlock an iPhone BUT Apple. Now, because Apple wouldn't cooperate, someone comes along and the FBI is now able to say... "oh never mind, I guess we don't need you after all". Had they unlocked the phone, they would've still been able to hold the claim that the iPhone is un-hackable.
     
  7. xeene

    xeene Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2010
    Messages:
    3,108
    Likes Received:
    906
    Trophy Points:
    208
    Location:
    usa
    Ratings:
    +1,044