Do You Think Verizon Should Be Able to Edit the Internet Before You Access It?

Discussion in 'Android News' started by dgstorm, Jul 11, 2012.

  1. dgstorm

    dgstorm Editor in Chief Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    10,217
    Likes Received:
    3,506
    Trophy Points:
    823
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +3,733
    [​IMG]

    In it's ongoing legal fight against the U.S. Government to stop Net Neutrality and the FCC's Open Internet Order, Verizon has made the laughable argument that it should be able to edit the internet at its discretion for its customers. Basically, Verizon's "point of view" is that as a broadband internet provider it should have "editorial discretion" to choose which content to provide to its customers, just like a newspaper editor, and that the Government is stepping on its constitutional right to do so. Here's a quote from Verizon's legal argument,

    This perspective stretches the limits of logic and borders on insanity. Verizon believes that they have a Constitutionally protected right to decide which content that their customers can access. Basically, Verizon is claiming that their right to free press guaranteed by the Constitution is being hampered by the Government because they are not being allowed to hamper your free speech rights to access whatever information you choose. They provide access to the Internet, they do not create the content that is on it. They should have no say in what we choose to find. How can any rational person wrap their head around this?

    Source: BGR
     
  2. justin82

    justin82 DF Super Moderator Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2009
    Messages:
    3,693
    Likes Received:
    214
    Trophy Points:
    178
    Ratings:
    +216
    we pay for there service its out device we should be able to view whatever we want to
     
  3. syndicate0017

    syndicate0017 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2011
    Messages:
    2,007
    Likes Received:
    48
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +48
    Sometimes I wonder if Verizon even listens to the fountain of BS they spew. Or do they say these things with their fingers plugging their ears?

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
     
    • Like Like x 2
  4. 94lt1

    94lt1 DF Super Moderator Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    16,385
    Likes Received:
    3,385
    Trophy Points:
    1,138
    Location:
    SE TX
    Ratings:
    +3,828
    Current Phone Model:
    Droid Turbo
    Exactly justin.... censorship is not being able to have a steak because a 6month old can't chew it!!!

    If they start trying to censor what we see, as adults??? Really?? If I want to see blood and guts.. then I want to see it.. if I want to see other things that they as a company don't agree with... so???

    Like was previously said... I pay for it... they can't tell me what I use it for.
    .
    When I buy gas, does conoco get to tell me where I can drive?? And how fast?? NO!!!

    Off my soapbox :)

    DROID RAZR MAXXIMIZED!!!! PREPARE TO BE VANQUISHED!!!
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. skidoo

    skidoo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2010
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    Virginia, USA
    Ratings:
    +0
    Conoco gets to tell you exactly what blend of gasoline you can put in your car. Within the parameters of certain regulations.

    Verizon certainly has a prerogative ipso facto to control the content they serve over their service.

    The question is, to what degree will we tolerate filtering, and at what point will we use government coercion (regulation) to force Verizon to conform to our expectations?

    NOTE: To be clear, I'm all for government regulation to compel Verizon to back the hell off.

    The "inverted free speech" argument can be obviated relatively easy by Congress; it's "only" a matter of how far they (we) are willing to go regarding the classification of Verizon in particular or ISPs in general.
    ___
    Sent from my phone. Please excuse typos.
     
  6. HardlyClerkin

    HardlyClerkin New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2011
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +0
    This one more thing that we need to vote with our dollars, we won't because they tend to be the best option in most cases. And unfortunately they know that and are trying to use that to their advantage.
     
  7. surferdave

    surferdave New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    Messages:
    16
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Ratings:
    +2
    They aren't really interested in making moral decisions about what you can or cannot see. They are interested in favoring the websites of parties who pay them to do so.

    But no doubt once they use this excuse to route your browser to Bing instead of Google if Microsoft is the high bidder, special interest groups who specialize in being offended will start hammering them to censure the web, and they will fold like all companies do.
     
  8. nikecar

    nikecar Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    1,238
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Ratings:
    +19
    The problem is on the broadband front. When I signed up for fios, I signed up for Internet at a certain speed. I didn't sign up for verizon's Internet content instead.

    Verizon has no right to tell me what I can view as long as it's within reason. Sure I could accept no access to child porn etc.

    Verizon offers their own portal if I choose to use it, obviously I don't.
     
  9. GAstorino

    GAstorino Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    Messages:
    93
    Likes Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    Ratings:
    +18
    Crazy that anyone would be for this in any form. They are providing the internet much like Xfinity, Hughes, etc. When they start "Filtering" what you get then you are going down the path of Communism or Facism. THey can then only filter what reality they want you to hear much like the Alphabet channels do today. We need unfettered data from all sides and the internet is the only way you can get that data in this day and age.
     
  10. Quicksilver7714

    Quicksilver7714 DF Super Moderator Rescue Squad Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2010
    Messages:
    2,437
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +60
    I'm going to make this simple. VZW can not filter my access to the Internet. I pay Verizon for Web access not for specific websites like a cable package.

    Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
     
    • Like Like x 4
  11. Narsil

    Narsil Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    Messages:
    707
    Likes Received:
    204
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Ratings:
    +231
    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 2
  12. jseah

    jseah Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2011
    Messages:
    978
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +25
    Didn't ISP's make this same argument back in the P2P and Napster days when a lot of people were sharing pirated movies and mp3's over the net and the RIAA were suing people left and right? They wanted the ability to block P2P or cancel subscribers who were illegally sharing music because the RIAA were suing them for "facilitating" the piracy of music.