Breaking News - In the Case of Apple vs. Samsung: Samsung found Guilty

Discussion in 'Android News' started by Garemlin, Aug 24, 2012.

  1. Garemlin

    Garemlin Developer Relations

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    Messages:
    2,421
    Likes Received:
    308
    Trophy Points:
    148
    Location:
    Delaware
    Ratings:
    +326
    Current Phone Model:
    LG G3 (VZW), Nexus 7 v2
    [​IMG]


    A federal jury in San Jose late Friday delivered a verdict in the landmark patent trial between Apple and Samsung.

    Lawyers on both sides, staying nearby at hotels, headed to the courtroom to hear the verdict.

    Jurors found that on the screen bounce-back patent, Samsung infringed on all phones and tablets. On patent 915, pinch and zoom, the jury found Samsung infringed with all but three devices.

    Samsung violated design patent for the front of the iPhone for all but one phone, according to the jury. On the home screen patent, Samsung violated with all phones, the jury found. Samsung did not violate Apple design patents on the iPad with its Galaxy Tab, the jury found.

    The technology titans -- Apple is the dominant tablet maker and Samsung leads in smartphone sales -- have battled for weeks in federal court here over allegations that Samsung copied Apple's mobile device designs and software.

    The case could determine damages of up to $2.5 billion against Samsung and as much as $422 million for Apple. It could also rewrite how global patent cases are decided in terms of mobile products.

    U.S. District Court Judge Lucy Koh presided over the San Jose courtroom. Last month, she awarded Apple a preliminary injunction that could force Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet computer from stores pending the outcome of the trial.

    Apple has presented hundreds of pages of documents, as well as the testimony of scientists, executives and engineers, to support its claims that its iPad and iPhone are being copied by Samsung. Apple wants products pulled and $2.5 billion in damages.
    In his closing argument, Apple attorney Harold McElhinny alleged that Samsung documents show that in three months, it was able to copy four years of Apple development. He said they show "hundreds of pages of copying directions" for icon design and functions such as tap-to-zoom that were put into the Galaxy phone and tablet line.
    He also said Samsung met with Google, which advised the company to change Galaxy designs, but Samsung declined.
    "The damages in this case should be large, because the infringement was massive," McElhinny said.
    Samsung lawyer Charles Verhoeven, in closing, shot back that the documents don't show what Apple claims. "It's a shell game for counsel trying to mislead you," he said. "They have to prove to you with their evidence that consumers will be deceived, there's a likelihood of deception. This doesn't meet the burden of proof."

    Apple has presented hundreds of pages of documents, as well as the testimony of scientists, executives and engineers. The company is seeking to have Samsung products pulled from market.

    In closing arguments on Tuesday, Apple attorney Harold McElhinny alleged that Samsung documents show that in three months, it was able to copy four years of Apple development. He said they show "hundreds of pages of copying directions" for icon design and functions such as tap-to-zoom that were put into the Galaxy phone and tablet line.

    He also said Samsung met with Google, which advised the company to change Galaxy designs, but Samsung declined.

    "The damages in this case should be large, because the infringement was massive," McElhinny said in closing arguments.

    Samsung lawyer Charles Verhoeven, in closing, shot back that the documents don't show what Apple claims. "It's a shell game for counsel trying to mislead you," he said. "They have to prove to you with their evidence that consumers will be deceived, there's a likelihood of deception. This doesn't meet the burden of proof."

    Much is at stake over patents that cover Apple's graphic user interface patents for touch screen functionality. Samsung, in effect, serves as a proxy for Google because the search giant's Android software powers the Samsung devices in question. The outcome could have implications for patent cases worldwide and for other makers of Android-powered devices.

    Samsung is seeking royalties for specific wireless technologies used by Apple.

    Apple shares edged up 0.11% to $663.95 in after-hours trading after the news.


    Source: USA Today
     
  2. DevilDogMP

    DevilDogMP Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Messages:
    3,779
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Ratings:
    +13
    I figured that would happen

    Sent from my DROID BIONIC
     
  3. pc747

    pc747 DF Administrator Staff Member Rescue Squad

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2009
    Messages:
    18,363
    Likes Received:
    1,619
    Trophy Points:
    958
    Ratings:
    +1,658
    Thanks for posting

    Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
     
  4. LoneWolfArcher

    LoneWolfArcher Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,232
    Likes Received:
    150
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +157
    Jury was either stoned, iPhone users, or both.
     
  5. zacedward

    zacedward Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +7
    Damn apple I hate apple
     
  6. DevilDogMP

    DevilDogMP Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Messages:
    3,779
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Ratings:
    +13
    Haha and why is that??

    Sent from my DROID BIONIC
     
  7. LoneWolfArcher

    LoneWolfArcher Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2009
    Messages:
    1,232
    Likes Received:
    150
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +157
    It isn't obvious?!
     
  8. zacedward

    zacedward Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +7
    Because they won there just money hungry
     
  9. _33

    _33 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2009
    Messages:
    263
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Philadelphia
    Ratings:
    +3
    It's time for EVERY manufacturer making Android phones to open up their patent portfolio's and hammer these tools all at once.
     
  10. zacedward

    zacedward Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    396
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +7
    I agree
     
  11. DevilDogMP

    DevilDogMP Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Messages:
    3,779
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Ratings:
    +13
    It's called competition lol

    Sent from my DROID BIONIC
     
  12. rjenk

    rjenk Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2010
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +0
    This just shows how screwed up the US Patent Office is...I am surprised they have not awarded a patent for breathing.
     
  13. DevilDogMP

    DevilDogMP Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2012
    Messages:
    3,779
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    Raleigh, NC
    Ratings:
    +13
    Y'all are cold haha

    Sent from my DROID BIONIC
     
  14. droid_mike

    droid_mike Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2010
    Messages:
    115
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +0
    They did: Patent #4,564,756. Pay up!!!
     
  15. chevycam94

    chevycam94 Steel Droid ROM Developer Developer

    Joined:
    May 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,396
    Likes Received:
    27
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    Ratings:
    +27
    Current Phone Model:
    LG G2 (VZW)
    Its called a MONOPOLY
     
Search tags for this page
apple case on samsung
,
apple samsung
,

apple vs samsung

,
criminal case for android tablet
,
criminal case samsung tablet
,
samsung vs apple
,
samsung vs apple photo
,
samsung vs apple wallpaper