Apple & Qualcomm Offer TSMC $1 Billion+ Bids for Exclusivity; TSMC Declines

Discussion in 'Android News' started by dgstorm, Aug 30, 2012.

  1. dgstorm
    Offline

    dgstorm Editor in Chief Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    7,780
    Likes Received:
    1,715
    Trophy Points:
    258
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +1,746
    [​IMG]

    Apparently, both Apple and Qualcomm both offered bonus deals of over $1 Billion dollars to TSMC in order for the manufacturer to reserve exclusive capacity for the foundry to build their chips. Apparently, TSMC builds the 28nm Snapdragon S4 line of chips for Qualcomm, and they wanted to insure their market capacity. Apple courted TSMC because they are likely looking to distance themselves as much as possible from Samsung despite assurances from Samsung that they will not let the court outcome affect their production of Apple chips.

    Even though both of these companies offered TSMC huge b̶r̶i̶b̶e̶s̶ investments, the chairman and CEO of TSMC, Morris Chang, declined both offers. Apparently, TSMC wants to keep their production more flexible to switch its production between customers and products, just in case some new disruptive tech comes along.

    Chief Financial Officer Lora Ho said in an interview on July 19, that (paraphrased) TSMC wants to retain control of its plants, doesn’t want to sell part of itself and doesn’t need cash for investments. Here's a quote with the wrap-up,

    Wise move.

    Source: AndroidTablets.net via Bloomberg
     
  2. combatmedic870
    Offline

    combatmedic870 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    1,333
    Likes Received:
    56
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Portland OR
    Ratings:
    +56
    Good.
     
  3. Narsil
    Offline

    Narsil Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2009
    Messages:
    609
    Likes Received:
    147
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Ratings:
    +153
    [​IMG]

    Morris Chang's using it.
     
  4. armeddroid
    Offline

    armeddroid Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2010
    Messages:
    1,641
    Likes Received:
    30
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Location:
    Traffic Capital
    Ratings:
    +30
    LOL @ APPLE

    You have been D.E.N.I.E.D.
     
  5. kodiak799
    Offline

    kodiak799 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    4,962
    Likes Received:
    283
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Ratings:
    +294
    Watch next week's news be about Apple buying the whole plant
     
  6. cybertec69
    Online

    cybertec69 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,852
    Likes Received:
    112
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Staten Island, NY
    Ratings:
    +113
    Apple knows what will be coming "retribution", so they are trying to brace themselves from the inevitable, and at the same time trying to monopolize the market, TSMC is not falling for it, they do not need Apple or anyone else including Qualcomm.
     
  7. MissionImprobable
    Offline

    MissionImprobable Silver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,916
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +85
    Things just keep getting worse for Apple the more they try to act like they are the only game in town. This is like the former A-lister being told he'll need to make an appointment for XYZ just like everyone else. TSMC is Cartman and Apple is Scott Tenorman.

    [​IMG]
     
  8. johnomaz
    Offline

    johnomaz Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,576
    Likes Received:
    324
    Trophy Points:
    148
    Location:
    Central Valley, California
    Ratings:
    +330
    I loved reading that! In other words, Apple can't monopolize the supply of the chips and essentially shut out other manufacturers from the chips. I remember when they did that for the LCD displays and no one could keep up with the demand because apple had all the parts.
     
  9. The Robot Cow
    Offline

    The Robot Cow Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2010
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    California
    Ratings:
    +1
    Yes!!! I'm glad they denied Apple. DancingNexus
     
  10. Valvoline
    Offline

    Valvoline Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Ratings:
    +14
    Once again Apple trying to buy tech not invent it. Innovation uhuh
     
  11. jroc
    Offline

    jroc Silver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    3,841
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    163
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Ratings:
    +61
    This made me lol....literally. I wouldnt be surprised if it happened. But this is a smart move by Mr Chang, TSMC.
     
  12. liftedplane
    Offline

    liftedplane Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    1,244
    Likes Received:
    131
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Washington State
    Ratings:
    +141
    I wonder how much it would cost apple, if he said no to 1 billion it would have to be over 10 billion to buy the plant.

    watch next week apple will SUE TSMC for patent infringement.
     
  13. kodiak799
    Offline

    kodiak799 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2010
    Messages:
    4,962
    Likes Received:
    283
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Ratings:
    +294
    No idea really. Could be nothing more than a negotiating ploy to get a little more money out of both Qualcomm and Apple. We also have no idea what sort of profitability is involved - you might get $1B from Apple that is pure profit, but make nothing (even lose a bit) on producing...and if they monopolize your whole plant?

    $10B+ seems like an enormous amount of money for one plant (safe bet on a multiple, but I assume that $1B exclusivity covered 5 years or more). Really my point was simply that if Apple is that concerned about capacity, they could easily buy the whole thing "name your price" sort of deal. And the whole thing really does sound like posturing on the part of TSMC CEO.
     
  14. MissionImprobable
    Offline

    MissionImprobable Silver Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Messages:
    1,916
    Likes Received:
    84
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratings:
    +85
    I agree with the decision though: the tech market evolves too quickly to be saddled to one company. Imagine if you'd had a five year deal with RIM starting in 2007 where that would have put your company at this point. :happy3:
     
  15. jroc
    Offline

    jroc Silver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    3,841
    Likes Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    163
    Location:
    Washington DC
    Ratings:
    +61
    This is a good point. In 2007....Rim was at the top or near the top and woulda been seen like a good thing to do at the time. Enter the iPhone......then enter Android.