Apple Found 'Not guilty' in $1Billion Anti-Trust Lawsuit; Jury Rules 'genuine product improvements'

Discussion in 'Android News' started by dgstorm, Dec 16, 2014.

  1. dgstorm

    dgstorm Editor in Chief
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    11,016
    Likes Received:
    3,979
    Trophy Points:
    823
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +4,254
    [​IMG]

    Imagine if you owned a media device and the company that produced that device admitted they stole some of your content and deleted it from your device without telling you. Would you give them a free pass and cite, "genuine product improvements" if they claimed that the move was a necessary security measure to protect you from malware? That's what a "jury of peers" determined in the recent anti-trust lawsuit against Apple.

    For years now, Apple has been embroiled in a lawsuit that they didn't instigate for a change. This time, the Cupertino company was being sued for anti-competitive practices designed to make it harder to use anyone else's stuff but theirs. Specifically, Apple was accused of implementing practices against competing digital music stores. It did this by restricting the songs that users could upload to their iPods to only those songs ripped from CDs or bought from iTunes.

    It later even publicly admitted that it did this by removing songs from people's iPods without even informing them. It claimed that this was done as a security measure in order to protect users from harmful or malicious content. Apparently, the jury in the case bought this feeble argument "hook-line-and-sinker." They let them off "Scott-free," reasoning that what Apple did was “genuine product improvements” and was not anticompetitive at all.

    Well... we do live in a world where "Flappy Birds" was the number 6 most searched for thing on Google in all of 2014... {feel free to roll your eyes now}

    Source: Twitter
     
    #1 dgstorm, Dec 16, 2014
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2014
  2. Ollie

    Ollie Droid Does

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2012
    Messages:
    3,438
    Likes Received:
    2,100
    Trophy Points:
    1,468
    Location:
    South Coast
    Ratings:
    +2,480
    Current Phone Model:
    Note Edge - iPhone 6 Plus
    Was a different outcome really expected? Try this case in Europe and the outcome would have been different.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  3. cereal killer

    cereal killer Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    11,397
    Likes Received:
    1,280
    Trophy Points:
    558
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +1,427
    Current Phone Model:
    Nokia Lumia Icon
    Can ANYONE tell me where the logic is in this case? I'm dumbfounded!! I rarely if ever use the term "epic stupidity" but this is epic stupidity. I cannot wrap my head around it. Somebody help me!!! Seriously, I'm not joking.

    The words I want to use right now aren't appropriate for this site. $$%%^%$#$&*!!! *&&*$$%^##@!!!!!!
     
    • Like Like x 6
    • Agree Agree x 3
  4. dgstorm

    dgstorm Editor in Chief
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2010
    Messages:
    11,016
    Likes Received:
    3,979
    Trophy Points:
    823
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +4,254
    Yeah... real justice seems hard to come by in the US nowadays @cereal killer.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. FoxKat

    FoxKat Premium Member
    Premium Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2010
    Messages:
    14,806
    Likes Received:
    4,751
    Trophy Points:
    838
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Ratings:
    +5,290
    Current Phone Model:
    Droid Turbo 2 & Galaxy S7
    The reason why... "jury of peers" - everyone on the jury had iPhones. Plain and simple. They probably dialed all the juror's phone numbers during the jury selection and listened for
     
    #5 FoxKat, Dec 16, 2014
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2014
    • Like Like x 2
    • Funny Funny x 2
  6. sst45jeff

    sst45jeff Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2009
    Messages:
    442
    Likes Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +60
    Current Phone Model:
    Droid Turbo
    If they were deleting music off of my device without my permission, I would consider that theft.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  7. cr6

    cr6 Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    8,371
    Likes Received:
    5,882
    Trophy Points:
    1,778
    Location:
    NW Rocky Mtn region
    Ratings:
    +6,713
    Current Phone Model:
    Galaxy S7 Edge
    Twitter:
    @dronewolfmedia
    This was actually one of the main reasons I didn't purchase an iPod back in the day when they were popular. That and I wasn't a fan of iTunes.
    The results of this trial absolutely boggle the mind!

    S5 tap'n
     
  8. cereal killer

    cereal killer Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    11,397
    Likes Received:
    1,280
    Trophy Points:
    558
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +1,427
    Current Phone Model:
    Nokia Lumia Icon
    not only that, but people will allow themselves to be infringed upon aka stolen from and not think twice about it. Heck they'll even agree to it! "Yeah yeah take my stuff off my iPod. Naw I'm not mad you didn't tell me. I probably deserved it"
     
    • Like Like x 2
  9. Jonny Kansas

    Jonny Kansas Administrator
    Staff Member Rescue Squad

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    16,546
    Likes Received:
    7,107
    Trophy Points:
    1,278
    Location:
    Michigan's Upper Peninsula
    Ratings:
    +8,455
    Current Phone Model:
    Pixel XL
    Twitter:
    jonny_ks
    **Expletives replaced by myself per site guidelines. You decide where they should've gone in your own head.***

    My goodness gracious! Who's selecting these monster-trucking juries these days? How Gall-bladder stupid do you seriously have to be to see this any other duck-butt (pushing the envelope or acceptable?) way than anti-competitive and theft!?

    Have to agree with FoxKat. The entire jury must've been comprised of iSheeple.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. 94lt1

    94lt1 Super Moderator
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    17,150
    Likes Received:
    4,040
    Trophy Points:
    1,138
    Location:
    SE TX
    Ratings:
    +4,530
    Current Phone Model:
    Droid Turbo 2
    I'd be beyond ticked.. I was ticked when my ripped songs stopped being supported on power amp.. I just re ripped and reformatted them.. Fixed that. But this.. I would be furious.. Once I own a device.. It's not for the manufacturer, provider(if applicable) or anyone one else, to tell me what's going to be on my device... Oh no...and to remove stuff without my say so.. Really.. It would bother me that THEY COULD remove stuff without my "accepting" their doing so..
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. cereal killer

    cereal killer Administrator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2009
    Messages:
    11,397
    Likes Received:
    1,280
    Trophy Points:
    558
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +1,427
    Current Phone Model:
    Nokia Lumia Icon
    @Jonny Kansas we are going to have to lift the language rule on site for this thread LOL. This is truly unbelievable!! I mean come on...how is this justified?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  12. 94lt1

    94lt1 Super Moderator
    Staff Member Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    17,150
    Likes Received:
    4,040
    Trophy Points:
    1,138
    Location:
    SE TX
    Ratings:
    +4,530
    Current Phone Model:
    Droid Turbo 2
    It's justified because the isheep were baaaaaaaaaaaaaaad... Or stuuuuuuuuuuupid.. Or both..
     
    • Like Like x 2