New ICS leak 6.7.235

[SamuriHL]

Good question. No idea as not a lot of people installed it thankfully. I really love this community. No one wanted to be stuck on 235 so most people have avoided it. Now someone is saying the qa server was updated again. Not sure if that means a new build or not. We need someone with 905 and cheesecake to take a look.

Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 2

[Hikenit]

If anyone is interested, the QA200 server has been updated again today. There might be something we can use. Pull anyone?

[Maddog241]

Good question. No idea as not a lot of people installed it thankfully. I really love this community. No one wanted to be stuck on 235 so most people have avoided it. Now someone is saying the qa server was updated again. Not sure if that means a new build or not. We need someone with 905 and cheesecake to take a look.

Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 2

I have tried almost all of the ICS leaks, but when I saw your warning (Thank you for that) I decided patience was the way this time.

[SamuriHL]

I have tried almost all of the ICS leaks, but when I saw your warning (Thank you for that) I decided patience was the way this time.

Smart move. We have a method to go forward now but never back from 235+. If there is a new build on the qa server we'll get a chance to see matt's script in action. We will let John Galt test it first since he's already on 235. But we need someone to check with cheesecake and see if there's a new build.

Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 2

[DoctorV]

Why do I have the feeling we're going to start going into November with threads like "New ICS leak 6.7.549!!! Soak test could be coming soon!!!!".

[sargentmajord]

Smart move. We have a method to go forward now but never back from 235+. If there is a new build on the qa server we'll get a chance to see matt's script in action. We will let John Galt test it first since he's already on 235. But we need someone to check with cheesecake and see if there's a new build.

Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk 2

Server has not been updated still .235

[Hikenit]

Server has not been updated still .235

My bad, just noticed that the date had changed to today. Just thought there might be another build out there.

[sargentmajord]

My bad, just noticed that the date had changed to today. Just thought there might be another build out there.

It takes anywhere from 72 hrs to a week for a new build to be created the .235 was a complete over haul with an additional 40 mb of code written hence the long space of time between the .232 an .235

[SamuriHL]

Thanks, sargentmajord!

[rbrill177]

First of all, thank you to everyone who has worked hard at helping us non-devs get the ICS leaks on our phones without the fear of the brick.

Next, most of us reading the ICS threads have flashed a leak or two and probably are at .232 at this time. I know most of us are pretty careful to always have a "way bac" to GB, but really, after playing with ICS for a couple weeks and not having the notorious data drops of GB, would we ever really flash back to GB? We know that we can send back a device to VZW with almost anything on it, rooted or not, and not have any warranty problems... so I can't see any other argument that compels us to need to go back to GB.

Now, I'm not saying that we should more forward and all flash the next greatest leak that comes along, but why are we all so hung up on the ability to flash back to the half-working piece of crap that VZW handed us and called a working GB build?

There's a hundred threads in this forum of us all crying out for our ICS, but when it gets here, we're worried about hanging on to GB. Not ranting or knocking anyone personally, but just wondering why we all feel the need to hang on to the old like it's gold. Gingerbread is/was a pretty good ver. of Android, just not the Bionic's version.