Anyone running the droid at 1.3Ghz?

[greg_p]

Those who will run 1.3GHz on the omap3430 would be very lucky. In lab we didn't went often over 950...

[MNTNBKR]

I don't know about everyone else, but I've been using the Sholes 2.0.2 ROM. After installing the ROM using the updater I used SetCPU to over-clock to 800 and then to 1000, but neither felt even marginally faster than the stock 550.

The ONLY noticeable difference for me was that I was able to play a video file while over-clocked that would not play at the stock 550Mhz for some reason.

Maybe something is wrong with my phone, but I'm not getting all the OC hype.

[lockdownx1x]

Some chips will run well at 1.3 and some won't. As has been said here before, there are small manufacturing difference that make some chips able to run faster than others. I apparently have a 1.1 max ghz chip. I would go to 1.3 if my chip would take it.

Just like with every CPU out their. Some can make it. Some cant. Unless you have a D0 i7 920, those things are monsters at 4Ghz.

[JhankG]

I flashed the 1.3 ghz kernel and went into a boot loop. 1.1 ghz was stable for me, although Taz's new kernels don't seem to work well with the Sholes ROM that I am using.

[lores35]

I have been running at 1.0GHz (Set CPU set up to run 1Ghz ondemand and 550, otherwise) for weeks and it seems peppier and stable. Picture libraries, which used to seem to take forever to load up as thumbnails are now loading virtually instantaneously.

[hydrogenman]

Those who will run 1.3GHz on the omap3430 would be very lucky. In lab we didn't went often over 950...

I'm one of the lucky ones

I have 1.3 running stable mostly...although it's rebooted itself once since I installed it.

It's running warmer than I'd like for idle temp out of pocket though, so probably going to go back to 800

[stlcity]

For the people who upped from 1.1 to 1.3Ghz: did you guys notice any difference. I am running stable on the AdamZ's smoked glass ROM at 1.1. Was planning to flash the 1.3Ghz to test tonite...

[Bear in NM]

Put me down as one who is running 1.3 with no program or app issues. I am running one of Petes roms, 8.3 modified. Perhaps another day or two may be needed to confirm, but fine so far. Have tried all of my programs, but no heavy phone useage.

When I went up to 1.3 yesterday, I worked my way up. Previously I was running the old 1.0g. Did have some problems with slowness and lag at the new 1.0 and 1.1, compared to the old 1.0, but things are screaming rigt along on the new 1.3. I think there are some differences between the new ones and the old ones, I think.

And I am usb pdanet tethering right now, running at 64F degrees by the Temp ap set to cpu, not battery.

Craig

[JhankG]

Put me down as one who is running 1.3 with no program or app issues. I am running one of Petes roms, 8.3 modified. Perhaps another day or two may be needed to confirm, but fine so far. Have tried all of my programs, but no heavy phone useage.

When I went up to 1.3 yesterday, I worked my way up. Previously I was running the old 1.0g. Did have some problems with slowness and lag at the new 1.0 and 1.1, compared to the old 1.0, but things are screaming rigt along on the new 1.3. I think there are some differences between the new ones and the old ones, I think.

And I am usb pdanet tethering right now, running at 64 degrees by the Temp ap set to cpu, not battery.

Craig

Celsius?

[BayouFlyFisher]

And I am usb pdanet tethering right now, running at 64 degrees by the Temp ap set to cpu, not battery.

Craig

Celsius?

Well, that is high, but the chip is rated at 70C. Isn't it? Wonder what the processor temp reading is if the chip is that high?