Samsung Galaxy Tab for the big 3 wireless carriers?

[YoungVan]

Samsung galaxy tab is smaller and therefore handier, though you will squint a bit more. It has some freedoms that the iPad lacks, such as Adobe Flash, MicroSD, and FLAC playback. It has a camera. You will not need iTunes in order to interoperate with a PC.It offers PC-like web-browsing on a 7-inch display. Moreover, users can continuously communicate via e-mail, voice and much more you can do.

[TheOldFart]

Samsung galaxy tab is smaller and therefore handier, though you will squint a bit more. It has some freedoms that the iPad lacks, such as Adobe Flash, MicroSD, and FLAC playback. It has a camera. You will not need iTunes in order to interoperate with a PC.It offers PC-like web-browsing on a 7-inch display. Moreover, users can continuously communicate via e-mail, voice and much more you can do.

This is the first tablet that I have seen, although there might be others, that has 1024 x 600 in a 7 inch screen. In my opinion, that is perfect for a tablet. Too small for a netbook, but a tablet is designed to be held comfortably. I think the 10 inch ones are too heavy. Now if I can get one without paying another $40 monthly for a line and a data plan. I just want it with wifi access. I think that is one thing that Apple did smart, allowing 3G to be an option.

[RemyL75]

Resolution isn't a deal-breaker for me. Long as I can see it (squinting when web surfing on a Droid is getting old... FAST lol), then i am good.

As for the weight issue, Archos 101 (10.1" screen) is 1.09 lbs, less than the iPad.

I agree with the 3G as and option. Paying extra for another data plan is overkill for me (have 2 smartphones, so 2 data plans). Another reason why I am looking REALLY HARD at the Archos tablets. None of the offer 3G, which is fine by me.