DroidForums.net is the original Verizon Android Forum! Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By MissionImprobable

Thread: Judge Koh Rules: Won't Triple Apple Damages; Won't Give New Trial to Samsung Either

  1. Editor in Chief
    dgstorm's Avatar
    Member #
    154790
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,362
    Liked
    2080 times
    Phone
    Enter Current Phone Model Here
    Premium Member
    #1

    Judge Koh Rules: Won't Triple Apple Damages; Won't Give New Trial to Samsung Either


    It has been quite some time since we heard anything from the most dominate and long-running story of 2012, the Apple vs. Samsung court war. In our estimation, it was a nice break from the constant roller-coaster of Patent Wars battles, but that doesn't mean news regarding the case can be completely ignored. A new development has finally taken shape today. Judge Lucy Koh ruled on the post trial motions from both camps.

    The good news is the Judge threw out Apple's request to triple the damages because she did not believe Samsung willfully infringed upon Apple's patents. The bad news is she also ruled against Samsung's request for a new trial. Samsung argued the jury process was tainted by the jury foreman, but even if that turns out to be true, the rules of the court will not allow Judge Koh to grant a new trial at this stage of the game, and that particular issue must be taken up in an appellate court.

    At this point this basically means the $1.05 Billion dollar verdict will stand, at least until it is heard on appeal. There were several more issues that were ruled upon during this final proceeding. Here's a quote with some additional detail,

    Judge Koh also ruled in favor of Apple when she invalidated a pair of claims Samsung filed on its U.S. Patent No. 7,675,941 for wireless data packet technology. She also denied Apple's motion for a ruling that its unregistered iPad/iPad 2 trade dress is protectable, infringed, and diluted; Koh ruled against Apple's request that she find that the Samsung GALAXY Tab 10.1 infringes the D889 Patent and denied Apple's claim that the 893, 711, 460, and 516 Patents are invalid. She also shot down Apple's claim that Samsung is liable to Apple for breach of contract and antitrust violations coming from a breach of the ETSI IPR Policy.

    Returning to the issue of whether Samsung willfully infringed on Apple's patents, the judge believed the Korean manufacturer when it said that it had thought that Apple's patents were invalid. Judge Koh believed that Samsung felt that it did not violate the law. Another interesting fact is that while the jury had found that Apple's multitouch patent ('915) was infringed on by a number of Samsung handsets running Android 2.2.1 or 2.2.2, it ruled that the Samsung Galaxy Ace (Android 2.2.1), Samsung Intercept (2.2.2) and Samsung Replenish (2.2.2, too) did not infringe on that patent. Samsung was hoping that this inconsistency could be rewarded with a new trial. But the 9th circuit has rules for this and while the judge noted the inconsistency, her hands were tied.
    So, for now it looks like the most toxic part of the Patent Wars will fade into a cold war for a while, at least until the appeals process begins in 2014.

    Source: PhoneArena
    Last edited by dgstorm; 01-30-2013 at 10:57 AM.
  2. Droid Ninja
    combatmedic870's Avatar
    Member #
    215306
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Portland OR
    Posts
    1,297
    Liked
    149 times
    Phone
    D1>D2>Inc2>Rez>Nexus>S3>IP5
    #2
    Apple....fighting innovation one trial at a time.
    Nexus 7 2 4.3 PA
    Unlocked and ROM'ed Note 3!!!!!
  3. Droid Sensei
    kodiak799's Avatar
    Member #
    39354
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    4,714
    Liked
    403 times
    Phone
    HTC Rezound
    #3
    I'm thinking they'll win on appeal.
  4. Droid Ninja
    MissionImprobable's Avatar
    Member #
    221238
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    1,901
    Liked
    263 times
    Phone
    Droid 2
    #4
    Crazy this will be dragged out over so long. Foolishness of the highest order. Apple needs to drop all of this and get back to innovation. There was a very good article about a computer company back in the 80s who played the same game and in the end found all of their patents invalidated and their business in the toilet.
    combatmedic870 likes this.
    What is best in life? "To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women."

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-19-2012, 08:28 PM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-19-2012, 12:15 PM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-27-2012, 08:41 AM
  4. Replies: 25
    Last Post: 07-18-2012, 11:30 PM
  5. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-06-2012, 02:55 PM
Find us on Google+