Verizon doesnt like the idea of open internet. At least not the idea of it potentially cutting into their profits. Today, Verizon filed an appeal in federal court claiming the rules of Net Neutrality are unnecessary and will create confusion for investors. Verizon released this statement on their website:
The Net Neutrality ruling just became official last week and if you havent been keeping up to date with your tech news, says that carriers cant block legit law-abiding sites (or apps) that directly compete with their service. For instance, it would be like AT&T blocking you from visiting competing carrier Sprints website. Not cool, right? Heres what the FCC had to say about the new Net Neutrality regulation that goes into effect November 20th.Verizon is fully committed to an open Internet. We are deeply concerned by the FCCs assertion of broad authority to impose potentially sweeping and unneeded regulations on broadband networks and services and on the Internet itself. We believe this assertion of authority is inconsistent with the statute and will create uncertainty for the communications industry, innovators, investors and consumers.
The internet should be free and open (we like that word around here). Anyone that disagrees well, probably has the title of CEO somewhere in their name.First, transparency: fixed and mobile broadband providers must disclose the network management practices, performance characteristics, and commercial terms of their broadband services. Second, no blocking: fixed broadband providers may not block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices; mobile broadband providers may not block lawful websites, or block applications that compete with their voice or video telephony services. Third, no unreasonable discrimination: fixed broadband providers may not unreasonably discriminate in transmitting lawful network traffic.
SOURCE: Verizon to FCC: Net Neutrality Rules 'Unneeded Regulation' (Phone Scoop)