DroidForums.net is the original Verizon Android Forum! Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 47
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Dutch Court Rules Against Samsung; Blocks Galaxy S, S2 & Ace in EU; Samsung Undaunted

  1. Editor in Chief
    dgstorm's Avatar
    Member #
    154790
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,331
    Liked
    2056 times
    Phone
    Enter Current Phone Model Here
    Premium Member
    #1

    Dutch Court Rules Against Samsung; Blocks Galaxy S, S2 & Ace in EU; Samsung Undaunted


    Samsung was dealt a harsh blow by a Netherlands Judge today in their ongoing legal battle against Apple. However, things may not be too grim for the Korean manufacturer. The court ruled that the Samsung Galaxy S, Galaxy S II, and Galaxy Ace infringe upon one of Apple's software patents. This is patent number EP 2059868, which is for a "portable electronic device for photo management." These phones have been subsequently banned from sale throughout the European Union. The ruling is in regards to the following specific patent that was violated:
    A portable electronic device with a touch screen display for photo management is disclosed. One aspect of the invention involves a computer-implemented method in which the portable electronic device displays an array of thumbnail images corresponding to a set of photographic images. The device replaces the displayed array of thumbnail images with a user-selected photographic image upon detecting a user contact with a corresponding thumbnail image in the array. The user-selected photographic image is displayed at a larger scale than the corresponding thumbnail image. The portable device displays a different photographic image in replacement of the user-selected photographic image in accordance with a scrolling gesture. The scrolling gesture comprises a substantially horizontal movement of user contact with the touch screen display.
    Here's a quote from the FossPatents article sharing a few more details on what it means for Samsung,
    In legal terms, the order does not bind Samsung's Korean parent company -- only three different Samsung subsidiaries registered in the Netherlands -- with respect to other countries than the Netherlands. However, it is my understanding that Samsung's European logistics use the Netherlands as the primary hub. If Samsung's Korean parent company wants to exercise its freedom to ship into other European countries despite this injunction, it will have to reorganize its logistics chain in Europe accordingly.
    The good news about this is that the judge rejected several other patent issues, as well as Apple's claim that Samsung had stolen many of its design ideas. This also means that the Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 will not be banned from sale. Furthermore, here's where things start to actually look even better. This is a quote directly from a BBC news article, quoting Samsung in regards to this outcome,
    Despite the impending embargo, Samsung welcomed the judgement. In a statement, the company said: "Today's ruling is an affirmation that the Galaxy range of products is innovative and distinctive.

    "With regard to the single infringement cited in the ruling, we will take all possible measures including legal action to ensure that there is no disruption in the availability of our Galaxy smartphones to Dutch consumers."
    It appears that Samsung has vowed to keep fighting, and will likely just make some adjustments to their software to make sure their phones are still available. We will continue to monitor the case and share any more relevant info.

    Source: GalaxyForums.net via AndroidCentral and FossPatents and BBC News
  2.  
     
     
     
  3. Super Moderator
    Trusstopher's Avatar
    Member #
    126629
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    2,598
    Liked
    476 times
    Twitter
    Trusstopher
    Phone
    G-Nex
    Premium Member
    #2
    Make is a "substantially vertical movement of user contact" and you've fixed the problem.
  4. DF News Team
    Arkbird's Avatar
    Member #
    130753
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Virginia/Washington DC
    Posts
    1,755
    Liked
    150 times
    Phone
    Droid Bionic
    Premium Member
  5. Master Droid
    Beardface's Avatar
    Member #
    54359
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    601
    Liked
    18 times
    Phone
    HTC Thunderbolt
    #4
    Wait, am I correct, or did Apple win this over 'pinch to zoom' and sideways flick to move from screen to screen.

    If thats the case, thats NOT a good sign for the rest of the Android platform.
    Carolina Hurricanes - 2006 Stanley Cup Champions

  6. DF News Team
    Arkbird's Avatar
    Member #
    130753
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Virginia/Washington DC
    Posts
    1,755
    Liked
    150 times
    Phone
    Droid Bionic
    Premium Member
    #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Beardface View Post
    Wait, am I correct, or did Apple win this over 'pinch to zoom' and sideways flick to move from screen to screen.

    If thats the case, thats NOT a good sign for the rest of the Android platform.
    No. The only thing Apple won was the scrolling portion where when you hit the bottom or top of the gallery it "bounced back." Check my update post.
  7. Senior Droid
    Tillmorn's Avatar
    Member #
    182198
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    185
    Liked
    28 times
    Phone
    Droid Bionic
    #6
    So they're saying Apple patented the ability to tap a thumbnail, see a larger view of it, then swipe horizontally to see the next picture. Surely Apple was not the first to implement such a feature on their devices. Otherwise, every smartphone/tablet/other touchscreen device would be in violation of such a thing. If that were the case, it seems highly unreasonable that Apple would have waited this long to strike down their competitors...
  8. Senior Droid
    Tillmorn's Avatar
    Member #
    182198
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    185
    Liked
    28 times
    Phone
    Droid Bionic
    #7
    Ah, never mind, the "bounce" feature. Intriguing. Definitely part of the touchwiz overlay though as I just checked both my phone and Zune, neither of which "bounce" thankfully.
  9. DF News Team
    Arkbird's Avatar
    Member #
    130753
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Northern Virginia/Washington DC
    Posts
    1,755
    Liked
    150 times
    Phone
    Droid Bionic
    Premium Member
    #8
    Yeah. Like they said, all that requires is a simple update on Samsung's part. So I guess Apple didn't really get the "victory" they were looking for.
  10. Master Droid
    SwiftLegend's Avatar
    Member #
    59573
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    703
    Liked
    37 times
    Phone
    VZW Note 2
    #9
    I really think Apple is pathetic. How are you suing someone for a swipe gesture? Don't you think that is kind of small? I mean come on, it's not like that is really a deciding factor on what phone to get. Seems to me like Apple patented all the little irrelevant things just to cover their asses so no one else could compete with their phone.
    One thing 127 Hours has taught me; Never forget the Swiss Army Knife, leave the "Cheap Made in China multi-tool" home.
  11. Droid Sensei
    OneTenderRebel's Avatar
    Member #
    53261
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Hampton Falls, NH
    Posts
    3,334
    Liked
    353 times
    Twitter
    JefFullerMyself
    Phone
    Galaxy Nexus
    #10
    yes the lawsuits suck but someone was stupid enough to award them patents for things that shouldn't have been awarded for. I mean technically Apple doesn't have to sue for it but they have every right to if they own the patents for these things. The problem lays with the system not Apple.
    Anytime someone dares me to walk a mile in their shoes I do it! Because, hey free shoes and I am now a mile away from that person!

    Hatred is by far the ugliest trait any human can possess (think about it)
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-23-2011, 02:41 PM
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-16-2011, 12:27 PM
  3. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 08-06-2011, 06:01 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-30-2011, 02:14 PM
  5. Replies: 74
    Last Post: 01-05-2011, 10:29 PM

Search tags for this page

apple lawsuit samsung phones
,
block websites on samsung galaxy ace
,

droid

,
dutch court rules s2
,
ep 2,059,868 flicking
,
ep 2059868 bounce
,
motorola suing samsung
,

ntc blocked galaxy ace

,
samsung blockas
,
sign android forum
Click on a term to search our site for related topics.
Find us on Google+