DroidForums.net is the original Verizon Android Forum! Registered Users do not see these ads. Please Register - It's Free!
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Samsung Denied Legal Peek of iPhone 5 and iPad3 in Apple Lawsuit Drama

  1. Editor in Chief
    dgstorm's Avatar
    Member #
    154790
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    6,331
    Liked
    2057 times
    Phone
    Enter Current Phone Model Here
    Premium Member
    #1

    Samsung Denied Legal Peek of iPhone 5 and iPad3 in Apple Lawsuit Drama


    Although it is debatable that this constitutes 'News', because this outcome was easily foreseeable, it is still worth noting: The judge in the Samsung vs. Apple counter-suit case denied Samsung's request to get a 'legal peek' at the iPhone 5 and iPad 3. Here's a quote from the Engadget article with some details,
    The court denied Samsung's motion on a number of grounds. For one thing, Apple's initial complaint pertained to infringement of existing products, parameters deemed legit by the court. Also, the court took into account the fact that Apple tends to be far more tight-lipped about its product releases, whereas Samsung made a point of offering up information about forthcoming products into the public domain, including the release of 5,000 Galaxy Tab 10.1 units as samples to the public. That said, the Judge was careful to note that Apple's suggestion that court protection of its trade secrets was insufficient "is not well taken."
    Again, this should not come as a surprise to anyone. It was highly unlikely that the judge would have ruled differently, and was really little more than "legal maneuvering" from Samsung. Still, there is some indication that Samsung's arguments actually had some merit in the Judge's eyes. Within the final court document, the Judge made sure to add a passage hinting that Apple may not get a preliminary injunction against the sale of certain Samsung products in the United States at this stage of the court proceedings. Here is what the Judge said,
    "Samsung is free to argue, for instance, that there is little likelihood of confusion because consumers will not encounter its products side-by-side with the iPhone 4 or iPad 2, but rather with Apple's next generation iPhone and iPad. Similarly, as to proximity, Samsung is free to argue that because the iPhone 4 and iPhone 2 will soon be outmoded and reduced in price, they are not being sold (or very soon will not be sold) to the same class of purchasers who are likely to buy new Samsung products. By choosing to allege infringement only of its current products, Apple opens itself up to these arguments."
    Ultimately, it is still entirely possible that a preliminary injunction could be granted based upon other grounds, but at this stage in the game, Apple needs to proceed very strategically. If Apple requests a preliminary injunction and the timing and argument they make are weak, then it could be denied, and the effect would make Apple look bad (or just worse depending on your point-of-view) in the public's eye. They will obviously move forward cautiously, as they are assuredly some of the best lawyers that Apple's deep pockets can employ, but perhaps there is some truth to earlier reports that executives within the two companies are trying to work things out away from the courtroom. Apple's lawyers have confirmed it, but Samsung's lawyers denied it, so, the "soap opera" continues...

    Source: Engadget and FOSS Patents
  2.  
     
     
     
  3. Droid Sensei
    jroc's Avatar
    Member #
    56815
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Washington DC
    Posts
    3,855
    Liked
    164 times
    Phone
    Droid 1, X, RAZR, Rez, Maxx HD
    #2
    It was a tactical move all along. And it looks like it may have paid off.

    No Galaxy S delay in the US? Win for Samsung for right now.
    The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.

    MLK, Jr.
  4. Master Droid
    RyanPm40's Avatar
    Member #
    64737
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    549
    Liked
    11 times
    Twitter
    RyanPm40
    Phone
    Samsung Galaxy S4
    #3
    tl;dr

    Can someone just do a short dumbed explanation of this for me, please? XD
  5. Droid
    jadesaber2's Avatar
    Member #
    16897
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    62
    Liked
    3 times
    Phone
    Droid Bionic
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by RyanPm40 View Post
    tl;dr

    Can someone just do a short dumbed explanation of this for me, please? XD

    APPLE: They're copying our stuff! Make them stop selling their stuff! And make them show us their stuff!

    SAMSUNG: Make them show us their stuff!

    COURTS: Samsung, show Apple your stuff. Apple, you don't have to show Samsung your stuff. But I'm leaning towards letting Samsung continue selling their stuff.
    Moto X

Links

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 31
    Last Post: 06-21-2011, 11:22 AM
  2. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-05-2011, 12:36 AM
  3. [Updated] Apple Brings Lawsuit Against Samsung
    By danDroid in forum Android News
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 04-26-2011, 10:54 AM
  4. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 01-20-2011, 06:47 PM
  5. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 03-25-2010, 12:17 AM

Search tags for this page

apple accused samsung news
,
apple vs droid legal case
,
average tegra 2 temperature
,

droid vs iphone lawsuit

,

forum of apple 5 and samsung

,
iphone 5 delaied because samsung lawsuit
,
iphone 5 delayed because lawsuit
,
iphone 5 delayed court case
,
iphone 5 forum
,
iphone 5 may be delayed due to lawsuit
,
samsung and iphone suit case
,
why iphone 5 is getting delayed lawsuit
Click on a term to search our site for related topics.
Find us on Google+